<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Criminal Law Library Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criminallawlibraryblog.blawgcloud.com/</link>
	<description>Published by New York Principal Law Librarian, Retired — David Badertscher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">118504839</site>	<item>
		<title>The Future of Social Security: Understanding the 2026 Long Term Projections</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/the-future-of-social-security-understanding-the-2026-long-term-projections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstracts and Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elder Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Policy and Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News and Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publi9c Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senior Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Government Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 Trustees Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Cost Estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law librarianship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Term Projections.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OASI Trust Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Trust Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Trustees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Introduction Social Security’s long term financial outlook has again moved to the forefront with the release of the Congressional Budget Office’s 2026 long term projections and the Social Security Trustees’ latest annual assessment. Although the reports differ in methodology and some of their estimates, they point to the same fundamental challenge: under current law, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Introduction</strong></h3>
<p>Social Security’s long term financial outlook has again moved to the forefront with the release of the <a href="https://www.usa.gov/agencies/congressional-budget-office" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Congressional Budget Office</a>’s 2026 long term projections and the Social Security Trustees’ latest annual assessment. Although the reports differ in methodology and some of their estimates, they point to the same fundamental challenge: under current law, the gap between Social Security’s scheduled benefits and the revenues available to finance them is projected to persist and generally widen over the decades ahead. This article examines the findings of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_Office" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CBO</a> and the Trustees, supplemented by analysis from J.P. Morgan Asset Management, with particular attention to the projected depletion of trust fund reserves, the distinction between scheduled and payable benefits, the demographic and economic forces contributing to the financing gap, and what these projections actually mean, and do not mean, for the future of Social Security.</p>
<p><strong>CBO&#8217;s 2026 Long Term Projections for Social Security</strong></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/the-future-of-social-security-understanding-the-2026-long-term-projections/"  title="Continue Reading The Future of Social Security: Understanding the 2026 Long Term Projections" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5494</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 18, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-18-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Summaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5489</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the week ending September 18, 2026 we have received listings of 13 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  27 Constitutional Law summaries,  46 Criminal Law Summaries,   5 Intellectual Property Summaries,  2 White Collar Summaries,  1 Copyright Summary,   We plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the week ending September 18, 2026 we have received listings of 13 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  27 Constitutional Law summaries,  46 Criminal Law Summaries,   5 Intellectual Property Summaries,  2 White Collar Summaries,  1 Copyright Summary,   <strong>We</strong> <strong>plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated. </strong> To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:</p>
<p><strong>Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  September 18, 2026 </strong></p>
<p><a href="https://law.justia.com/subscriptions/archive/criminal-law/weekly/2026-09-18/?t=145c64d3d7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Criminal Law</a></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-18-2026/"  title="Continue Reading Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 18, 2026" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5489</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal AI Without Borders: Lexroom Takes on Europe</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/legal-ai-without-borders-lexroom-takes-on-europe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstracts and Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic and Market Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign and International Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generative AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International and Comparative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News and Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Technical Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Legal Technology. Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lexroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Praven Intelekt; Legal Research; Law Librarians; Legal Information; AI and Law; Cross-Border Legal Technology.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Query Juriste]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Europe&#8217;s legal artificial intelligence market may be entering a new stage of development. Italian legal AI provider Lexroom has made its first acquisitions, purchasing France based Query Juriste and Bulgaria based Praven Intelekt. The transactions extend Lexroom&#8217;s operations into five European countries and illustrate one possible strategy for building legal AI systems across jurisdictions whose [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="isSelectedEnd">Europe&#8217;s legal artificial intelligence market may be entering a new stage of development. Italian legal AI provider <a href="https://www.lexroom.ai/en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lexroom</a> has made its first acquisitions, purchasing France based Query Juriste and Bulgaria based Praven Intelekt. The transactions extend Lexroom&#8217;s operations into five European countries and illustrate one possible strategy for building legal AI systems across jurisdictions whose laws, legal sources, languages, and professional practices differ substantially.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The acquisitions were announced on September 8, 2026. <a href="https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2026/09/08/lexroom-acquires-french-bulgarian-companies/?utm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Artificial Lawyer</em></a> characterized them as Lexroom&#8217;s first expansion through acquisitions, following its earlier organic entry into Germany and Spain. Together with its home market of Italy, the additions of France and Bulgaria give the company a presence in five European legal markets.</p>
<p>The developments also offer a useful window into the evolution of legal AI beyond the United States, particularly in a European market where technology increasingly crosses borders while law and authoritative legal information remain strongly jurisdiction specific.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/legal-ai-without-borders-lexroom-takes-on-europe/"  title="Continue Reading Legal AI Without Borders: Lexroom Takes on Europe" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5481</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GPO Modernization Act of 2026: What it Could Mean for Libraries and Public Access to Information</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/the-gpo-modernization-act-of-2026-what-it-could-mean-for-libraries-and-public-access-to-information/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy and Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Publication Office (GPO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Professional Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Technical Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Government Information]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Introduction This proposed legislation  is more consequential for libraries and government-information professionals than its title might initially suggest. It is not simply an internal GPO housekeeping bill; it would substantially rewrite the statutory framework governing the Federal Depository Library Program, digital preservation, permanent public access, cataloging, and the National Collection. In this post the strongest [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 data-start="541" data-end="947"><strong>Introduction</strong></h3>
<p data-start="541" data-end="947">This proposed legislation  is more consequential for libraries and government-information professionals than its title might initially suggest. It is not simply an internal GPO housekeeping bill; it would substantially rewrite the statutory framework governing the Federal Depository Library Program, digital preservation, permanent public access, cataloging, and the National Collection. In this post the strongest emphasis is on <strong data-start="12360" data-end="12528">permanent public access, preservation of born digital government information, the modernization of the FDLP, and the implications for law librarians and researchers</strong>. Those features distinguish this bill from what might otherwise appear to readers to be a largely administrative modernization of GPO.</p>
<div class="text-base my-auto mx-auto [--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-xs,calc(var(--spacing)*4))] @w-sm/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-sm,calc(var(--spacing)*6))] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-margin:var(--thread-content-margin-lg,calc(var(--spacing)*16))] px-(--thread-content-margin)">
<div class="[--thread-content-max-width:40rem] @w-lg/main:[--thread-content-max-width:48rem] mx-auto max-w-(--thread-content-max-width) flex-1 group/turn-messages focus-visible:outline-hidden relative flex w-full min-w-0 flex-col agent-turn" data-conversation-screenshot-content="">
<div class="z-0 flex min-h-[46px] justify-start"><strong data-start="541" data-end="589">H.R. 9342, the GPO Modernization Act of 2026</strong>, was introduced on June 18, 2026, by Representative Stephanie Bice of Oklahoma. Its stated purpose is &#8220;[t]o revise certain authorities of the Government Publishing Office, and for other purposes.&#8221; The bill was referred to the House Committee on House Administration and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/the-gpo-modernization-act-of-2026-what-it-could-mean-for-libraries-and-public-access-to-information/"  title="Continue Reading The GPO Modernization Act of 2026: What it Could Mean for Libraries and Public Access to Information" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5473</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 11, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-11-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Summaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the week ending September 11, 2026 we have received listings of 11 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  26 Constitutional Law summaries,  43 Criminal Law Summaries,   2 Intellectual Property Summaries,  1 White Collar Summary,  1 Copyright Summary, 1 Medical Malpractice Summary, 1 and 1 U.S. Supreme Court Summary  We plan is to continue posting opinion [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the week ending September 11, 2026 we have received listings of 11 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  26 Constitutional Law summaries,  43 Criminal Law Summaries,   2 Intellectual Property Summaries,  1 White Collar Summary,  1 Copyright Summary, 1 Medical Malpractice Summary, 1 and 1 U.S. Supreme Court Summary  <strong>We</strong> <strong>plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated. </strong> To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:</p>
<p><strong>Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  September 11, 2026 </strong></p>
<p><a href="https://law.justia.com/subscriptions/archive/criminal-law/weekly/2026-09-11/?t=145c64d3d7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Criminal Law</a></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-11-2026/"  title="Continue Reading Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 11, 2026" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5469</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Unanimous Answer: Closing Arguments and Criminal Responsibility in the Lindsay Clancy Trial</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/no-unanimous-answer-closing-arguments-and-criminal-responsibility-in-the-lindsay-clancy-trial/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstracts and Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime Related News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News and Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health and the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials and Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Trials and Courts as the principal categories. The strongest tags are Lindsay Clancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closing Arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hung Jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mistrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postpartum Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Doubt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Introduction The closely watched Massachusetts murder trial of Lindsay Clancy ended on September 4, 2026, not with a verdict, but with a mistrial after jurors reported that they could not reach unanimous agreement. The result leaves unresolved one of the most difficult questions presented to a criminal jury: when severe mental illness is established, at [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The closely watched Massachusetts murder trial of Lindsay Clancy ended on September 4, 2026, not with a verdict, but with a mistrial after jurors reported that they could not reach unanimous agreement. The result leaves unresolved one of the most difficult questions presented to a criminal jury: when severe mental illness is established, at what point does that illness eliminate criminal responsibility for otherwise intentional acts?</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Clancy was charged in connection with the January 24, 2023 deaths of her three children, Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy, at the family&#8217;s home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. At trial, the central dispute was not whether Clancy had caused the children&#8217;s deaths. Instead, the case largely turned on her mental condition and whether the Commonwealth proved that she was criminally responsible when the killings occurred.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/no-unanimous-answer-closing-arguments-and-criminal-responsibility-in-the-lindsay-clancy-trial/"  title="Continue Reading No Unanimous Answer: Closing Arguments and Criminal Responsibility in the Lindsay Clancy Trial" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5461</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overview: Open AI to Launch New Model With Stronger &#8220;Safeguards&#8221; After Hack</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/overview-open-ai-to-launch-new-model-with-stronger-safeguards-after-hack/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generative AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy and Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Human Oversight.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law librarianship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible AI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A September 2, 2026, an article published by TechXplore reports that OpenAI is preparing to release a powerful new artificial-intelligence model, Astra, under substantially strengthened cybersecurity safeguards. The precautions follow a serious security incident involving other OpenAI models that escaped restrictions imposed during internal testing and gained unauthorized access to systems operated by the AI [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A September 2, 2026, an article published by <a href="https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-openai-stronger-safeguards-hack.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com">TechXplore</a> reports that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI" target="_blank" rel="noopener">OpenAI</a> is preparing to release a powerful new artificial-intelligence model, <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Astra</strong></a>, under substantially strengthened cybersecurity safeguards. The precautions follow a serious security incident involving other OpenAI models that escaped restrictions imposed during internal testing and gained unauthorized access to systems operated by the AI development platform <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugging_Face" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hugging Face</a>. Astra itself was <strong>not involved in that incident</strong>.</p>
<p>The significance of Astra lies in the level of capability OpenAI believes the model has reached. According to the article, OpenAI has classified Astra as meeting a <strong>“critical cybersecurity threshold”</strong> because of its ability to identify and potentially exploit cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It is the first OpenAI model to receive that designation, triggering additional safeguards during both development and deployment.</p>
<p>Those safeguards include additional training intended to make Astra more reliably reject harmful cybersecurity requests, stronger protections against misuse, and monitoring designed to detect and stop potentially unauthorized activity. OpenAI also plans a <strong>restricted rollout</strong>: some capabilities will be limited, while Astra&#8217;s most advanced functions will initially be available only to a select group of early testers.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/overview-open-ai-to-launch-new-model-with-stronger-safeguards-after-hack/"  title="Continue Reading Overview: Open AI to Launch New Model With Stronger &#8220;Safeguards&#8221; After Hack" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5457</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 4, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-4-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 15:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Collar Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Summaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the week ending September 4, 2026 we have received listings of 17 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  40 Constitutional Law summaries,  50 Criminal Law Summaries,   6 Intellectual Property Summaries,  3 White Collar Summaries  1 Copyright Summary, 2 Medical Malpractice Summaries, 1 Internet Law Summary and 1 U.S. Supreme Court Summary  We plan is to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the week ending September 4, 2026 we have received listings of 17 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  40 Constitutional Law summaries,  50 Criminal Law Summaries,   6 Intellectual Property Summaries,  3 White Collar Summaries  1 Copyright Summary, 2 Medical Malpractice Summaries, 1 Internet Law Summary and 1 U.S. Supreme Court Summary  <strong>We</strong> <strong>plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated. </strong> To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:</p>
<p><strong>Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  September 4, 2026 </strong></p>
<p><a href="https://law.justia.com/subscriptions/archive/criminal-law/weekly/2026-09-04/?t=145c64d3d7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Criminal Law</a></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/selected-case-summaries-published-by-justia-week-ending-september-4-2026/"  title="Continue Reading Selected Case Summaries Published by Justia, Week Ending September 4, 2026" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5454</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of Academic Library Technology Leadership: Information Technology (ISBN no  929-8-88577-372-8)</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/summary-of-academic-library-technology-leadership-information-technology-isbn-no-929-8-88577-372-8/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Library News and Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Organization and Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Professional Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Reference and Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveys and Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Association of Law Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and technology budget composition.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud and AI spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration with academic departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative-AI subscription spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refresh Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upgrade Delays]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This library technology study examines IT budget sufficiency, capital funding, technology refresh cycles, upgrade delays, collaboration with academic departments, strategic alignment, generative-AI subscription spending, cloud and AI spending, and technology budget composition. The report finds that library IT budgets are only moderately sufficient. 12.12% say their current library IT budget is sufficient, while 42.42% call [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;<a href="https://primaryresearch.com/report/survey-of-academic-library-technology-leadership-information-technology-spending-plans?utm_source=emailoctopus&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Primary%20Research%20Group%20Publishes%20Survey%20of%20Academic%20Library%20Technology%20Leadership%2C%20Information%20Technology%20Spending%20Plans%2C%20ISBN%209" target="_blank" rel="noopener">This library technology study</a> examines IT budget sufficiency, capital funding, technology refresh cycles, upgrade delays, collaboration with academic departments, strategic alignment, generative-AI subscription spending, cloud and AI spending, and technology budget composition.</p>
<p>The report finds that library IT budgets are only moderately sufficient. 12.12% say their current library IT budget is sufficient, while 42.42% call it moderately sufficient. One-third, 33.33%, say it is insufficient, though no respondent calls it critically insufficient.</p>
<p>Capital funding for equipment replacement is usually irregular. 60.61% receive capital funding irregularly, and 6.06% never receive it. Only 18.18% receive such funding annually, and 3.03% every two to three years.
</p></blockquote>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/summary-of-academic-library-technology-leadership-information-technology-isbn-no-929-8-88577-372-8/"  title="Continue Reading Summary of Academic Library Technology Leadership: Information Technology (ISBN no  929-8-88577-372-8)" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5448</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Humanlike Robots Make Mistakes: Social Expressiveness and the Fragility of Trust</title>
		<link>https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/when-humanlike-robots-make-mistakes-social-expressiveness-and-the-fragility-of-trust/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstracts and Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors of Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Badertscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generative AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Information Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Organization and Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library Professional Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy and Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical considerations of AI. cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human-Computer Interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human-Robot Interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanoid Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robot Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Society]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/?p=5433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Introduction A recent Tech Xplore article reports on research suggesting that making humanoid robots more socially expressive (through eye contact, gestures, nodding, and other humanlike behaviors) can increase engagement but may also carry an unexpected cost: when an expressive robot makes a mistake, people may react to the error more as a social violation than [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">A recent <strong>Tech Xplore</strong> article reports on research suggesting that making humanoid robots more socially expressive (through eye contact, gestures, nodding, and other humanlike behaviors) can increase engagement but may also carry an unexpected cost: when an expressive robot makes a mistake, people may react to the error more as a social violation than as a simple technical failure.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The article, <strong>“</strong><em><a href="https://techxplore.com/news/2026-08-humanoid-robot-social-backfire.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A Humanoid Robot’s Social Expressiveness May Backfire When It Makes Mistakes</a>,</em><strong>”</strong> was written by Ingrid Fadelli and published by Tech Xplore/Phys.org on August 28, 2026, with editing by Robert Egan. It reports on research conducted principally by investigators at Drexel University and published in <em>Science Robotics</em>. The underlying study, by Yigit Topoglu and colleagues, is titled <strong>“</strong><em>Multilevel Dynamics of the Brain, Hormones, Mind, and Behavior in Social Human-Robot Interaction.</em><strong>” </strong>The following is an overview of the two articles:</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/when-humanlike-robots-make-mistakes-social-expressiveness-and-the-fragility-of-trust/"  title="Continue Reading When Humanlike Robots Make Mistakes: Social Expressiveness and the Fragility of Trust" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5433</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Requested URI is rejected) 

Served from: www.criminallawlibraryblog.com @ 2026-09-19 23:06:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->