<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Texas Divorce Attorney Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/</link>
	<description>Published by Texas Collaborative &#38; Family Attorney — McClure Law Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Texas Appeals Court Addresses Separate Property Ownership in Divorce Involving Third-Party Interests</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-appeals-court-addresses-separate-property-ownership-in-divorce-involving-third-party-interests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesca Blackard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate property]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Property acquired before marriage generally remains separate property in a Texas divorce, even if the spouse purchased it with someone else. A recent Texas appeals court decision examined whether a former husband&#8217;s claims to a residence and vehicle could overcome evidence that his wife acquired both before their marriage. Pugh v. Winfield-Pugh, No. 14-25-00403-CV (Tex. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Property acquired before marriage generally remains separate property in a Texas divorce, even if the spouse purchased it with someone else. A recent Texas appeals court decision examined whether a former husband&#8217;s claims to a residence and vehicle could overcome evidence that his wife acquired both before their marriage. <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fourteenth-court-of-appeals/2026/14-25-00403-cv.html"><em>Pugh v. Winfield-Pugh</em></a>, No. 14-25-00403-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 26, 2026).</p>
<h2><strong>Husband Challenges Wife&#8217;s Separate Property Claims</strong></h2>
<p>The parties married in July 2021, and the wife filed for divorce in January 2023. The husband disputed her separate property claims to a Katy residence and a vehicle. After an initial appeal resulted in a new trial on property division, the wife presented additional evidence supporting her ownership.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-appeals-court-addresses-separate-property-ownership-in-divorce-involving-third-party-interests/"  title="Continue Reading Texas Appeals Court Addresses Separate Property Ownership in Divorce Involving Third-Party Interests" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3266</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Supreme Court Rejects Foreign Divorce Judgment Over Due Process Violations</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-supreme-court-rejects-foreign-divorce-judgment-over-due-process-violations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly McClure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Texas courts may recognize divorce judgments issued in other countries under the doctrine of international comity, but that recognition is not automatic. In a recent decision, the Texas Supreme Court held that a foreign divorce obtained without constitutionally adequate notice could not prevent a spouse from pursuing divorce proceedings in Texas. Azhar v. Choudhri, No. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas courts may recognize divorce judgments issued in other countries under the doctrine of international comity, but that recognition is not automatic. In a recent decision, the Texas Supreme Court held that a foreign divorce obtained without constitutionally adequate notice could not prevent a spouse from pursuing divorce proceedings in Texas. <a href="http://docs.texasappellate.com/scotx/op/24-0939/2026-09-25.pc.pdf"><em>Azhar v. Choudhri</em>, No. 24-0939 (Tex. Sept. 25, 2026)</a>.</p>
<h2><strong>Foreign Divorce and Community Property Dispute</strong></h2>
<p>The parties married in Pakistan in 2008, and the wife moved to Houston in 2010. During their marriage, the couple accumulated more than $100 million in community assets through the husband&#8217;s Texas business interests.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-supreme-court-rejects-foreign-divorce-judgment-over-due-process-violations/"  title="Continue Reading Texas Supreme Court Rejects Foreign Divorce Judgment Over Due Process Violations" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3264</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Determines a Child’s Last Name When Divorcing Parents Disagree in Texas?</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/who-determines-a-childs-last-name-when-divorcing-parents-disagree-in-texas/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesca Blackard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Name Change]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When parents disagree about a child&#8217;s last name during a Texas divorce, neither parent has the exclusive right to make that decision. Under Texas Family Code § 45.004(a)(1), a court may order a child&#8217;s name changed if the change is in the child&#8217;s best interest. A recent Texas appeals court decision examined whether a mother [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When parents disagree about a child&#8217;s last name during a Texas divorce, neither parent has the exclusive right to make that decision. Under <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/?tab=1&amp;code=FA&amp;chapter=FA.45&amp;artSec=45.004">Texas Family Code § 45.004(a)(1)</a>, a court may order a child&#8217;s name changed if the change is in the child&#8217;s best interest.</p>
<p>A recent Texas appeals court decision examined whether a mother could retain the surname she selected for her child without the father&#8217;s input, despite the parents remaining married when the child was born: <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/sixth-court-of-appeals/2026/06-25-00104-cv.html"><em>In re Marriage of Callahan and Lewis</em></a>, No. 06-25-00104-CV (2026).</p>
<h2><strong>Background of the Case </strong></h2>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/who-determines-a-childs-last-name-when-divorcing-parents-disagree-in-texas/"  title="Continue Reading Who Determines a Child’s Last Name When Divorcing Parents Disagree in Texas?" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3260</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Parental Rights Termination in Texas: Why Endangerment Findings Are Hard to Overturn on Appeal</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/understanding-parental-rights-termination-in-texas-why-endangerment-findings-are-hard-to-overturn-on-appeal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly McClure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Termination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Terminating parental rights in Texas requires clear and convincing evidence of both a statutory ground for termination and that termination serves the child&#8217;s best interest. A recent Texas appeals court decision demonstrates how evidence of past endangerment can undermine a parent&#8217;s efforts to overturn a termination order, even when the parent claims to have made [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminating parental rights in Texas requires clear and convincing evidence of both a statutory ground for termination and that termination serves the child&#8217;s best interest. A recent Texas appeals court decision demonstrates how evidence of past endangerment can undermine a parent&#8217;s efforts to overturn a termination order, even when the parent claims to have made improvements. <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/FA/htm/FA.161.htm#161.001">Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001(b)</a>.</p>
<h2><strong>Texas Court Terminates Mother&#8217;s Parental Rights Following Drug Use Allegations</strong></h2>
<p>In <em>In re J.B. and B.B.</em>, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed a termination lawsuit in June 2024 following reports of substance abuse, neglectful supervision, and unsafe living conditions. Both children tested positive for illegal drugs, and the Department had investigated the family repeatedly since 2015. <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/eleventh-court-of-appeals/2026/11-26-00093-cv.html">No. 11-26-00093-CV (Tex. App.—Eastland Sep. 24, 2026, no pet.) (mem. op.)</a>.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/understanding-parental-rights-termination-in-texas-why-endangerment-findings-are-hard-to-overturn-on-appeal/"  title="Continue Reading Understanding Parental Rights Termination in Texas: Why Endangerment Findings Are Hard to Overturn on Appeal" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3258</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Challenging False Paternity and Pregnancy Claim in Texas</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/challenging-false-paternity-and-pregnancy-claim-in-texas/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesca Blackard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Paternity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A disputed paternity claim can become particularly complicated when the alleged father questions whether there is a pregnancy at all. That issue received national attention in a recent case where Laura Owens accused former “Bachelor” star Clayton Echard of fathering her alleged twins and initiated a paternity case against him. Although the case arose in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A disputed paternity claim can become particularly complicated when the alleged father questions whether there is a pregnancy at all. That issue received national attention in a <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/court-of-appeals-division-two-unpublished/2025/2-ca-cv-2024-0315.html">recent case</a> where Laura Owens accused former “Bachelor” star Clayton Echard of fathering her alleged twins and initiated a paternity case against him. Although the case arose in Arizona, it raises important questions about how Texas law would apply when both pregnancy and paternity are disputed.</p>
<h2><strong>The Laura Owens Paternity Litigation</strong></h2>
<p>Owens alleged that she became pregnant after a casual sexual encounter with Echard in May 2023 and claimed she was carrying twins. In August 2023, while she claimed the pregnancy was ongoing, Owens filed a paternity petition alleging Echard was the father.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/challenging-false-paternity-and-pregnancy-claim-in-texas/"  title="Continue Reading Challenging False Paternity and Pregnancy Claim in Texas" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3256</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abby Elliott and Bill Kennedy’s Divorce Raises Questions About Spousal Maintenance Under Texas Law</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/abby-elliott-and-bill-kennedys-divorce-raises-questions-about-spousal-maintenance-under-texas-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly McClure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Spousal Support]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Bear actor Abby Elliott and her producer husband, Bill Kennedy, are divorcing after nearly ten years of marriage. Both spouses are asking for spousal support while simultaneously asking the court to prevent the other from receiving it. Elliott requested support when she filed for divorce, and Kennedy later filed his own request for support [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bear actor Abby Elliott and her producer husband, Bill Kennedy, are <a href="https://torontosun.com/entertainment/celebrity/abby-elliott-file-divorce-husband-bill-kennedy">divorcing</a> after nearly ten years of marriage. Both spouses are asking for spousal support while simultaneously asking the court to prevent the other from receiving it. Elliott requested support when she filed for divorce, and Kennedy later filed his own request for support while seeking to terminate the court’s ability to award support to Elliott. Although their divorce is governed by California law, we can analyze how their case hypothetically could play out under Texas law.</p>
<p>In Texas, a spouse’s request for maintenance does not establish that the spouse is entitled to receive it. Here, a court may award post-divorce maintenance only when the spouse seeking it satisfies the requirements detailed in the Texas Family Code. <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/?tab=1&amp;code=FA&amp;chapter=FA.8&amp;artSec=8.051">Tex. Fam. Code § 8.051</a>.</p>
<h2><strong>When Can a Spouse Receive Spousal Maintenance in Texas?</strong></h2>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/abby-elliott-and-bill-kennedys-divorce-raises-questions-about-spousal-maintenance-under-texas-law/"  title="Continue Reading Abby Elliott and Bill Kennedy’s Divorce Raises Questions About Spousal Maintenance Under Texas Law" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3251</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interstate Child Custody Jurisdiction in Texas: What a Recent Case Means for Families Facing UCCJEA Conflicts</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/interstate-child-custody-jurisdiction-in-texas-what-a-recent-case-means-for-families-facing-uccjea-conflicts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesca Blackard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When parents and children have connections to more than one state, determining which state’s courts have authority to decide custody can become a threshold issue in a Texas family law case. The Texas Supreme Court’s recent decision in In re Interest of K.N. illustrates an important distinction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When parents and children have connections to more than one state, determining which state’s courts have authority to decide custody can become a threshold issue in a Texas family law case. The Texas Supreme Court’s recent decision in <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/supreme-court/2026/24-0881.html"><em>In re Interest of K.N.</em></a> illustrates an important distinction under the <a href="https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/library/publications/uniform-child-custody-jurisdiction-and-enforcement-act">Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA)</a>: a Texas court may still have the authority to decide a custody case even when the specific UCCJEA rule being used to justify the court&#8217;s involvement does not apply. <em>In re K.N.</em>, No. 24-0881, slip op. at 9–14 (Tex. June 5, 2026).</p>
<h2><strong>The Facts of <em>In re K.N.</em></strong></h2>
<p>The case arose from a child-protection proceeding involving four children and repeated allegations of abuse concerning the oldest child. After the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services became involved, the parents were ordered to participate in services, and the trial court ultimately appointed the Department temporary managing conservator.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/interstate-child-custody-jurisdiction-in-texas-what-a-recent-case-means-for-families-facing-uccjea-conflicts/"  title="Continue Reading Interstate Child Custody Jurisdiction in Texas: What a Recent Case Means for Families Facing UCCJEA Conflicts" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3249</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separate Property Reimbursement for Marital Home Mortgages Under Texas Family Code § 3.402</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/separate-property-reimbursement-for-marital-home-mortgages-under-texas-family-code-%c2%a7-3-402/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly McClure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Property Rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When one spouse uses separate property to pay down the mortgage on a home owned by the community estate, the spouse may be entitled to reimbursement in a Texas divorce. This can occur when a spouse uses money from an inheritance, savings accumulated before marriage, or other separate funds to pay a debt that benefits [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When one spouse uses separate property to pay down the mortgage on a home owned by the community estate, the spouse may be entitled to reimbursement in a Texas divorce. This can occur when a spouse uses money from an inheritance, savings accumulated before marriage, or other separate funds to pay a debt that benefits the community estate. <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/?tab=1&amp;code=FA&amp;chapter=FA.3&amp;artSec=3.402">Tex. Fam. Code § 3.402</a>.</p>
<h2><strong>Separate Property and the Marital Home</strong></h2>
<p>Texas law generally classifies property owned by a spouse before marriage, as well as property acquired during marriage by gift or inheritance, as separate property. Property acquired during marriage is generally community property. <a href="https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/?tab=1&amp;code=FA&amp;chapter=FA.3&amp;artSec=">Tex. Fam. Code §§ 3.001–.002</a>.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/separate-property-reimbursement-for-marital-home-mortgages-under-texas-family-code-%c2%a7-3-402/"  title="Continue Reading Separate Property Reimbursement for Marital Home Mortgages Under Texas Family Code § 3.402" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3247</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Appeals Court Sets High Bar for Overturning an “Unconscionable” Prenuptial Agreement</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-appeals-court-sets-high-bar-for-overturning-an-unconscionable-prenuptial-agreement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francesca Blackard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Prenuptial Agreement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Texas courts tend to hold a hard line on enforcing premarital agreements, and a spouse seeking to have it overturned must satisfy the specific requirements established by the Texas Family Code. A recent Dallas appeals court decision illustrates why an agreement will not be invalidated even if one party is disadvantaged at the time of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas courts tend to hold a hard line on enforcing premarital agreements, and a spouse seeking to have it overturned must satisfy the specific requirements established by the Texas Family Code. A recent <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2026/05-24-00312-cv-0.html">Dallas appeals court decision</a> illustrates why an agreement will not be invalidated even if one party is disadvantaged at the time of the drafting and signing.</p>
<h2><strong>The Potyondy Prenuptial Agreement</strong></h2>
<p>Brendan Potyondy and Meredith Potyondy met in Austin. At the time, Brendan worked in the oil and gas industry and had accumulated assets before the marriage, whereas Meredith did not. After numerous drafts, the parties signed a premarital agreement two days before their wedding. Meredith did not have her own attorney representing her in connection with the agreement. <em>In re Marriage of Potyondy</em>, No. 05-24-00312-CV.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-appeals-court-sets-high-bar-for-overturning-an-unconscionable-prenuptial-agreement/"  title="Continue Reading Texas Appeals Court Sets High Bar for Overturning an “Unconscionable” Prenuptial Agreement" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3245</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Supreme Court Clarifies When a Jury Verdict Controls a Child’s Primary Residence</title>
		<link>https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-supreme-court-clarifies-when-a-jury-verdict-controls-a-childs-primary-residence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly McClure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/?p=3243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When parents are going through a custody dispute, it can be difficult to understand what role the judge and jury play in the custody award. A question that arose in a recent Texas Supreme Court case was: if a jury decides that the children should primarily live with one parent, can a judge still give [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When parents are going through a custody dispute, it can be difficult to understand what role the judge and jury play in the custody award. A question that arose in a recent Texas Supreme Court case was: if a jury decides that the children should primarily live with one parent, can a judge still give the other parent more time with the children? The court addressed the issue and clarified that a judge cannot use a possession schedule to effectively override the jury’s decision about which parent will have the children’s primary residence. <a href="https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1462766/250161.pdf"><em>Gopalan v. Marsh</em></a>, No. 25-0161, slip op. at 12–13 (Tex. May 22, 2026).</p>
<h2><strong>The Facts of the Case</strong></h2>
<p>The case arose from the divorce of Prabhakar Gopalan and Andrea Marsh following their nine-year marriage. The parents agreed to joint managing conservatorship of their two children, but they disputed the allocation of parental rights, possession, and other issues concerning the children. After a five-day jury trial, the jury determined that Gopalan should have the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence within Travis County.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/blog/texas-supreme-court-clarifies-when-a-jury-verdict-controls-a-childs-primary-residence/"  title="Continue Reading Texas Supreme Court Clarifies When a Jury Verdict Controls a Child’s Primary Residence" class="more-link">Continue Reading ›</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3243</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
