Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Trividia Health, Inc. has issued an Urgent Medical Device Correction about updated use instructions for TRUE METRIX Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System, TRUE METRIX AIR Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System, TRUE METRIX GO Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System, and TRUE METRIX PRO Professional Monitoring Blood Glucose System. Cobranded products sold under store or distribution partner names also have instructions that have been updated.

This is important because diabetics and others with blood sugar concerns may receive inappropriate readings. The recall is for a problem with the E-5 error code and the user instructions in the messages portion of the owner’s instructions for use. The meter shows the same E-5 error code for both very high blood glucose events and when there is a test strip error.

When a user gets an error code while experiencing a high glucose event, they might not get the proper treatment or might not seek treatment while they try to figure out what the error means. If, on the other hand, they wrongly assume that they are experiencing a high blood glucose event but received an error code, they might treat themselves for the high blood glucose even though they have normal or lower blood glucose. Delays in treatment or treatment that’s not needed can result in severe health problems including changed mental status, dehydration, loss of consciousness or even death.

Trividia has reported 114 serious injuries and a death arising out of this problem as of January 16. If you suffer an adverse reaction as a result of a false E-5 error code you can contact Trividia Health at 1-888-835-2723 or trividia0126CC@trividiahealth.com. However, if you were actually injured as a result of the false E-5 error code, the company’s remedy may be insufficient. It may be appropriate to bring a product liability lawsuit to recover compensation for your injuries.

Flaws in how the meter is made, designed, or marketed may be actionable. Problems with instructions for use may be marketing defects. When our lawyers are able to establish liability for a defective product, we can recover both economic and noneconomic damages arising from the loss. These can include medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, and replacement services.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was injured by a TRUE METRIX blood glucose monitoring system, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Trividia Health Issues a Correction for Its TRUE METRIX Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Tesla Claim

The vehicles affected by the recall feature hardware version 3, which Tesla hasn’t produced since January 2024. In its recall notice, the NHTSA pointed out that losing the rearview camera image could increase the chances of a crash, though a driver could check over their shoulder and use their mirrors. There have been no reports of injuries, fatalities, or crashes based on the rearview camera issue. There have been 27 warranty claims and two field reports that might be associated.

The Tesla recall covers the following models: the 2021 Tesla Model Y, 2022 Tesla Model Y, 2023 Tesla Model Y, 2023 Tesla Model 3, 2021 Tesla Model 3, 2022 Tesla Model 3, 2020 Tesla Model Y, 2022 Tesla Model X, 2022 Tesla Model S, 2021 Tesla Model S, 2023 Tesla Model X, 2023 Tesla Model S, 2021 Tesla Model X and 2017 Tesla Model 3.

Tesla has announced it will issue a no-cost over-the-air software update, replacing version 2026.8.6 with 2026.8.6.1.

Although a driver may be backing up slowly, problems with rearview cameras can result in deadly crashes, particularly when small children are involved. It takes just a moment for a small child to be run over by a vehicle or a pedestrian to be struck when a driver lacks visibility.

In such cases, the causes of the accident will need to be closely examined to determine who may be held responsible. There may be situations where the manufacturer is solely to blame, and a product liability lawsuit may be brought. These are lawsuits brought when there is a design, manufacturing or marketing defect. Since the issue with certain models of Teslas involves a delay with the rearview image that can be addressed with a software update, it seems likely to be a design flaw. To recover damages in a case involving injuries or death, we would need to prove liability by establishing strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, breach of contract, or statutory violations.

There are also circumstances in which multiple causes come together and combine to cause a collision that produces injuries or fatalities. For example, the rearview image delay may be partially to blame but a driver may have acted negligently in reversing too rapidly without waiting for the image to appear and without checking over his or her shoulder. In those cases, it might be appropriate to pursue compensation from both the driver and the manufacturer.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was injured in a collision involving a Tesla, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Tesla Will Recall Almost 219,000 of Its Vehicles appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Only the 6 mL bottles of Afrin nasal spray are affected by the recall. The recall applies to around 786,100 bottles. They were sold between September 2024 to April 2026 for $7 – $9 at convenience stores and travel hubs, such as airports. The problem with the noncompliant packaging of the 6 mL nasal spray is that it isn’t child resistant and it also doesn’t carry a required labeling statement. These problems present a risk of serious injury or illness if a child swallows the contents of the bottles.

Affected by the recall are unexpired 6 mL (travel-size) bottles of Travel Size Afrin Original Nasal Spray from Lot numbers 230361, 240822, 241198, 250066, 250152, 250646, and 250831. The containers have “Afrin® Original Nasal Spray” and “1/5 FL OZ (6 mL)” printed on a label that is on the front of the bottle. This is a six-digit number, after which is the expiration date in the format of “YYYYMMM.”

Consumers have been asked to secure the recalled bottles out of sight of children and to request a refund on the website www.livewell.bayer.com/afrin-original-spray-recall. While there have been no injuries or illnesses reported so far, a refund would be insufficient in the event that a consumer’s child was injured as a result of noncompliant packaging. Where there is injury or illness in connection with the nasal spray, it may be appropriate to pursue damages in a product liability lawsuit.

Bayer issued the voluntary recall after federal regulators noted that the packaging was a potential danger to kids. It believes that the problem is merely a labeling problem, not something connected to the quality of the product or its safety. However, it’s important to be aware that labeling flaws, whereby a danger is not disclosed to the consumer, are sometimes actionable. In a product liability lawsuit, you can pursue damages in connection with manufacturing, design, and marketing defects. Often marketing defects involve failure to warn. In this case, the package was required to have a label that said not only “Keep out of reach of children” but also “Package not child-resistant”; it did not have the latter label.

If we can establish Bayer’s liability in a case like this, our attorneys may be able to recover both economic and noneconomic damages arising out of your child’s injuries or illness on your behalf.

Discuss Your Lawsuit with an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If your child was injured by Afrin, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Recall of 6 mL Size Afrin Original Nasal Spray Bottles appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Thermos Claim

Thermos has gotten 27 reports of consumers who were hit by a forcefully ejected stopper when the jar or bottle was opened. In some cases, the laceration or impact injuries necessitated medical attention. Three people experienced permanent vision loss after being hit in the eye by the stopper.

The bottles and jars were sold at Walmart, Target, and other retail stores around the country around March 2008 and July 2024. Additionally, they were sold in the same time frames on Amazon.com, Thermos.com, Target.com, and Walmart.com.

Only certain Thermos jars and bottles were affected by the recall. Affected models include the Thermos Stainless King Food Jars with model numbers SK3000 and SK3020, made before July 2023 and all Thermos Sportsman Food & Beverage Bottles with model number SK3010. The problem is that the stopper of these jars and beverages don’t have a pressure relief in the center.

The containers are sold in many different colors in a range of sizes of 16-oz, model number SK3000, 24-oz, model number SK3020, and 40-oz, model number SK3010. You can find the model numbers on the bottom of the recalled jars and bottles.

Consumers have been asked to stop using the recalled jars and bottles right away. It is possible to get a free replacement pressure relief stopper or bottle. However, if you were injured by an ejected stopper, you may be wondering whether you have any recourse. In that case, it may be appropriate to discuss what happened with our lawyers to determine whether you have grounds to bring a product liability lawsuit against Thermos.

Product liability lawsuits can be brought in connection with manufacturing, design, or marketing defects. Manufacturing defects are usually flaws that affect only certain batches or units of a product; they exist when the unit has deviated from the design specifications. Design defects, on the other hand, exist when there are flaws in the specifications themselves.

Our lawyers will also need to establish a theory of liability to recover damages on your behalf. These theories could include negligence, breach of warranty, breach of contract, strict liability, and statutory violations. When we are able to establish liability, we can recover both economic and noneconomic damages arising out of your impact or laceration injuries on your behalf.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was injured by a Thermos jar or bottle, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Thermos Recalled 8.2 Million Stainless King Food Jars and Bottles appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Sizing Catheter Claim

On April 2, Cook Medical sent out a letter to tell affected customers that they should examine their inventory to figure out whether they had affected products and quarantine those affected products that weren’t already used. The company had found that the marker bands on specific catheters could be at an increased risk of breaking or cracking.

Customers were also told not to distribute or use whatever was remaining of the affected products. Adverse events related to the sizing catheters can be reported to Cook Medical Customer Relations by phone at 800.457.4500 or 812.339.2235, Monday through Friday between 7:30am and 5:00pm (Eastern Time), or by email to: CustomerRelationsNA@CookMedical.com.

Also, in April the FDA published an early alert that the catheters in question were linked to an increased risk of cracking or breaking while being used. There were no injuries or deaths, but the risk of increased times for the procedure, dangers associated with fragmenting the device, and vessel injury, was thought to be notable.

Since then, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has also finalized its Class I recall for specific lots of the affected catheters. A Class I recall is the most serious kind of recall; it is issued when there’s a reasonable probability that using the product in question will generate severe negative heath outcomes or even death.

If you were already injured or a loved one was injured or killed by a fragmenting catheter or otherwise defective catheter, you may be able to seek relief in a product liability lawsuit. These lawsuits can be brought in connection with three different actionable types of defects: marketing, manufacturing or design. Since the issue here appears to be cracked marker bands, the defect is likely one of manufacturing or design. Theories of liability we may need to establish in order to recover damages on your behalf vary according to state law but may include negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, breach of contract, and statutory violations.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was injured by the recalled sizing catheters, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Recall of Cook Medical’s Sizing Catheters appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Grill Brush Claim

Nexgrill has become aware of a minimum of 68 reports and reviews that state that the grill brushes’ small wire bristles detached. There were five reports of people who swallowed the metal bristles and needed medical care to get the bristles removed from their throat or digestive tract.

The recalled grill brushes, which are between 18 and 21 inches long, and have the word “Nexgrill” on them, were sold at Home Depot and online at homedepot.com from 2015 through 2026 for $5 to $15. They have black plastic or wood handles.

The recalled models of the metal wire bristle grill brushes are as follows: Nexgrill 19-Inch Grill Brush (Model Number 530-0024); Nexgrill Grill Brush with Scraper (Model Number 530-0024G); Nexgrill Long Handle Grill Brush (Model Number 530-0034); Nexgrill Grill Brush and Scraper (Model Number 530-0039); Nexgrill Grill Brush with Scrub Pad (Model Number 530-0041); and Nexgrill Wood Handle Grill Brush (Model Number 530-0042).

Consumers have been asked to stop using the recalled brushes and to contact the company for a full refund in the form of a gift card. This remedy likely would not suffice in the case of someone who was injured by the metal bristles. In such a case, it may be appropriate to bring a product liability lawsuit. These types of suits are brought when a product is defective in terms of its manufacturing, design, or marketing. Our lawyers would need to establish a theory of liability; the available theories of liability vary from state to state, but could include strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, breach of contract or statutory violations.

If our attorneys can establish liability for a defective Nexgrill brush, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. Economic damages can include medical bills, lost wages, replacement services, and out-of-pocket costs. For example, if you needed to have a surgery as a result of a metal bristle getting stuck in your throat, you should be able to recover the cost of the surgery plus the time off work. Noneconomic damages include pain and suffering, lost earning capacity, mental anguish, and loss of consortium.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was harmed by Nexgrill 19 brushes that have been recalled, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Over 10.2 Million Metal Wire Bristle Grill Brushes Were Recalled by Nexgrill appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Bassinet Claim

The AirClub convertible bassinets were sold online at Amazon from October 2023 to December 2025 for between $110 and $130. These bassinets convert into a bedside sleeper. They come in the colors of purple, beige, and light grey and have quilted padding. Around 110,400 bassinets were affected by the recall. The label at the bottom of the bassinets, underneath the mattress pad, will say Product Model QX-831. Meanwhile consumers have been asked to stop using the bassinets right away and to contact the manufacturer for a replacement attachment mechanism.  No injuries or deaths have been reported yet.

It may be appropriate to pursue compensation by filing a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer. These are lawsuits that are brought when a product, such as a bassinet, is defective in terms of its design, manufacturing, or marketing. Typically, it’s crucial to retain a knowledgeable expert or group of experts who can opine on whether the product has one of these defects and whether that defect caused your baby’s injuries or death. Generally, design defects are found in every unit of a product; the bassinet might have a design defect if the gap exists in every bassinet of that model. Manufacturing defects, meanwhile, are defects that occur only in certain units of the product; the exist because there has been a deviation from the specifications or design. Marketing defective often involve a failure to warn of dangers.

If our firm can establish liability for a defective bassinet that caused your injuries, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. Economic damages for injuries to an infant may include the parent’s lost wages attending to the child’s injuries, medical bills, and out-of-pocket costs. Noneconomic damages may include mental anguish, emotional distress, and pain and suffering.

Wrongful death damages would be available in the event that an infant died as a result of a fall or suffocation from the recalled convertible bassinet. This compensation can include medical and funeral bills; other expenses or out-of-pocket costs; lost benefits; pain and suffering and mental anguish of the infant’s survivors, usually the parents; loss of companionship; and in cases of egregious misconduct, punitive damages meant to punish wrongdoers and deter future wrongdoing.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was harmed by the AirClub bassinets that have been recalled, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. We are committed to fighting for people around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post AirClub Convertible Bassinets Recalled appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Amgen Claim

In its announcement, the agency stated that it had identified 76 instances of drug-induced liver injury and among those, eight deaths. The evidence suggests that these injuries may be caused by Tavneos. Among the injuries were seven cases of vanishing bile duct syndrome, which is a rare condition that can lead to permanent liver damage.

Tavneos is a medical treatment approved to treat anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, which is a group of rare autoimmune diseases that inflame small- to medium-sized blood vessels.

According to Amgen, the FDA requested that it voluntarily withdraw Tavneos from the market. Concerns had emerged during a re-evaluation of primary endpoint data for nine of 331 patients that were enrolled in a late-stage trial that supported its approval. The company decided not to withdraw the drug because, it said, it wasn’t aware of problems with the underlying patient data, and that it continued to support Tavneos’s benefit-risk profile. It continued to work with the FDA.

The European Medicines Agency has started a review of Tavneos on the grounds that information has emerged that raises questions about its study’s data integrity. In Europe and Australia, the Tavneos labels reference post-marketing cases of vanishing bile duct syndrome, but the United States labels don’t warn about it. Amgen has stated it requested that the FDA add vanishing bile duct syndrome to the Tavneos label, and that this request is still pending.

If you were adversely affected by Tavneos, you may be able to bring a product liability lawsuit. Pharmaceuticals and other products may be defective in terms of their marketing, manufacturing, or design. Most of the time, when the problem is not with the drug but with the marketing, it is considered a failure to warn case; in this case, it might be a failure to warn of vanishing bile duct syndrome. In most lawsuits, it’s necessary to retain an expert to opine on whether there is a defect and whether that defect caused injuries to a plaintiff.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was harmed by Tavneos, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. If our firm can establish liability for a defective treatment, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post The Food and Drug Administration Warns Liver Injuries Possible appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Chicago-based Moll Law Group About Your Claim

The 4our Kiddies tip restraint kits, which has plastic tip restraints or furniture straps, were sold on Amazon.com from June 2019 through January 2026 for $6 to $21. They were recalled on March 26, 2026, because they may have a hidden defect.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission has become aware of a minimum of 150 cases where consumers reported that the plastic tip restraint kits broke. Three of these cases involved tip-over accidents.

These kits contain two white plastic mounts, one of which attaches to the furniture and the other of which attaches to the wall where the furniture is located. They also include two drywall anchors, two types of screws, and a white plastic cable zip tie. Consumer Product Safety Commission testing found that the recalled plastic tip restraints do not meet the industry standard requirements for tip restraints. Furthermore, the plastic that the brackets, mounts and cable zip tie are made of can become degraded or break over time, which can result in furniture tipping and harming a consumer.

Knowing that you’ve installed a tip restraint may lull you into a false sense of security that your furniture will not tip over. Unfortunately, there is the potential for danger, perhaps even more serious danger, since you assume the furniture that is secured by the tip restraints is safe for your child to be around. Around 253,500 tip restraint kits are affected by this recall.

The company 4our Kiddies has asked consumers to stop using the 4ourKiddies plastic tip restraints and contact the company for a stainless-steel replacement tip restraint kit. Children should be kept away from the furniture that’s held to the wall by the plastic tip restraint kits while awaiting the replacement kit.

What if you or your child was already injured by a furniture tip-over as a result of the 4our Kiddies plastic restraints? It may be appropriate to bring a product liability lawsuit against the company. These can be brought when a product has a design, manufacturing, or marketing defect.

Consult an Experienced Chicago-based Product Liability Attorney

If you or a loved one was harmed by the 4ourKiddies tip restraint kits that have been recalled, call the knowledgeable Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages. If our firm is able to establish liability for a defective tip kit, we may be able to recover a range of economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post 4our Kiddies Tip Restraint Kits Recalled Due to Tip-Over Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury and Death appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Cartiva Claim

Each of the plaintiffs was implanted with the Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant. These implants, which are put in place during a minimally invasive 30-minute outpatient procedure, are supposed to provide a cushioning effect, and allow for the replacement of painful, damaged cartilage without fusion of the joint.

In their lawsuits, the plaintiffs alleged that the implant was defective and that, as a result, they suffered from persistent pain and limited range of motion after being implanted with them and then needed further surgery to remove the failed implants and fuse their arthritic joints. Their claims were for strict product liability, negligence, and breach of express and implied warranties.

Cartiva opposed the transfer. It argued that the plaintiffs had different theories of their injuries and that this would result in individual factual questions predominating over the common ones. It also argued, incorrectly, according to the Judicial Panel, that the plaintiffs were alleging different injuries. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, which heard the motion, clarified that all five lawsuits asserted pain and suffering not limited to the failure of the Cartiva SCI and the implant’s migration.

The Judicial Panel found that there would be common factual questions about causation, testing of the implants, whether Cartiva’s labeling was sufficient, Cartiva’s representations to the FDA while the device was being approved, and the circumstances of Cartiva’s eventual recall of the device.

The Judicial Panel determined that the five lawsuits involved common questions of fact and that centralization in the Eastern District of Arkansas would serve the parties’ and witness’ convenience, promoting just and efficient actions in the litigation.

Consult an Experienced Product Liability Attorney

The Cartiva toe implant may be defective in terms of its manufacturing, design, or marketing. When our firm can establish a defendant’s liability for a defective product that caused injuries, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on the plaintiff’s behalf. These damages can include pain and suffering, emotional distress, mental anguish, medical bills, wage loss, replacement services, loss of consortium and more.

If you or a loved one was harmed by a defective Cartiva toe implant, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based medical device lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages.  We dedicate ourselves to fighting for people around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Cartiva Toe Implant Litigation is Centralized appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.