Call Moll Law Group About Your Toxic Tort Claim

The Pew and Ipsos survey was conducted between October 10, 2025 and October 17, 2025. There were 5357 adult subjects. Results were high across self-identified demographic categories. Those who agreed that the government should do more to control chemical safety included 90% of those who didn’t identify politically, 88% of Democrats, 89% of liberals, 85% of moderates, 77% of conservatives, and 79% of Republicans.

The purpose of the survey is to reduce exposure to dangerous chemicals that can disrupt the endocrine system, which produces hormones that affect human development like puberty, metabolism, childhood development, immunity, and reproduction. Certain chemicals increase the likelihood of multiple health impacts including infertility, preterm birth, reduced sperm quality, impaired brain development, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer. These chemicals are found everywhere—in food, drinking water, construction materials and consumer products. Almost everyone in the country has detectable levels of chemicals in their bodies; these commonly found chemicals include phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and some flame retardants.

The government doesn’t oversee harmful chemicals to the extent that they could, and do not require transparency about what products they are contained in. 84% of survey respondents said that the government should do more to identify and regulate dangerous chemicals found in everyday consumer products. Likewise, 83% said that business that make chemicals located in everyday products can’t be trusted to make sure products are safe without governmental involvement. 83% want businesses to provide more information about chemicals found in their products.  to tell them more about the chemicals in their products.

When you or your child has suffered environmental injuries due to dangerous chemicals in your food, water, consumer products, and food packaging, you may be able to bring a toxic tort lawsuit with the help of an experienced attorney. What our lawyers need to prove depends on the particular circumstances of the case since different legal theories, statutes, and regulations may apply depending on the nature of the chemicals involved and the injuries. In general, we’ll need to prove (1) the substance was toxic, (2) you were exposed to it, and (3) you were injured by the exposure and suffered damages.

Consult an Experienced Environmental Safety Attorney

If you or a loved one was harmed by chemicals in the environment, call the seasoned Chicago-based toxic tort lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable basis to sue for damages.  When our firm can establish liability for dangerous or toxic chemical exposure, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. We dedicate ourselves to fighting for people around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post 5 out of 6 Americans Are Concerned About Chemical Safety appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About an IKM Claim

The recalled items are the IKM aluminum saucepan wooden handle 9 inches (56 pieces); the A-cook Aluminum Kadai size 5 (43 pieces); the brass tope (10 pieces), and the IKM 4-quart Pital brass pot (9 pieces). No illnesses have been reported to date.

However, even low levels of lead exposure can result in significant health problems, especially in fetuses and children because of their rapid growth, metabolism, and smaller body size. When the levels of lead are lower, there may not be clear symptom, but the child may still struggle to learn and to suffer from low IQ and behavioral issues. When lead levels are high, the symptoms can include neurological changes, stomach pain, headache, and fatigue.

The IKM products were distributed to California grocery stores mainly in big cities like Sacramento and San Jose, as well as other cities such as Roseville, Pleasanton, Fresno, Hercules, Richmond, El Cerrito, Dublin, Manteca, Tracy, Milpitas, Pittsburg, Fremont, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale.

In order to figure out whether you’ve bought any of the affected cookware, you should look at their design and alloy. The aluminum kadai is a silver-colored vessel, similar to a wok, which has a wide basin and doesn’t have a long handle. The saucepan is around 9 inches in diameter and has a wooden handle. The brass tope is similar to a standard stock pot. The pital brass pot is dull gold with a deep body.

The recall occurred because of an FDA routine sampling program that found the finished pots and pans had elevated lead levels. IKM has stopped distributing the pots and pans as it continues to try to figure out what caused the problem.

Theories of liability that may be used to recover damages in a product liability lawsuit about the pots and pans vary from state to state, but typically, they include negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, breach of contract, and statutory violations. Products can be defective in terms of their manufacturing, marketing, or design.

If you were injured by IKM products, you should consult the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to discuss whether you have a viable claim for damages. We are dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured consumers around the United States. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post IKM Recalls Product Due to Potential Health Danger appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Infant formula and follow-on formula were initially recalled after Nestlé’s testing discovered, during routine self-monitoring, that part of the production line had suspected Bacillus cereus contamination. Additional testing occurred and they found that cereulide, which is a toxin produced by specific strains of Bacillus cereus, was found in one of the raw materials, arachidonic acid oil (ARA), along with oil mixes containing ARA, that were used to produce the formula.

These findings caused Nestlé to expand the recall’s scope to include more products and additional countries where the facilities may have used that ingredient.

Parents have been asked to check the product details on formula that they are feeding their babies. As a parent, you should take a look at not only the brand name, but also the batch and lot number and expiration date on the infant or follow-on formula you’re using. No recalled products should be used even if it seems normal in appearance or smell. You cannot destroy cereulide toxin by heating it up or boiling it; it might not be destroyed in the course of preparation or processing.

You should also look out for symptoms of cereulide exposure if you’ve fed your child recalled formula. The symptoms include severe vomiting and nausea that occur within five hours of consuming the formula and lasts up to 24 hours. If your child has these symptoms, you should call your health care provider right away for medical advice. You should also monitor updates.

Besides the United States, the countries that are affected include Ukraine, Trukey, Sweden, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Russia, Portugal, Poland, Mexico, Italy, Ireland, Hungary, France, Finland, Denmark, Czech Republic, Croatia, China, Brazil, Australia, and Argentina. The Nestlé brands that are listed include Guigoz OptiPro Relais, NAN Sensitive 1, NAN Supreme, NAN OptiPro, NAN ExpertPro, NAN Pro 1, NAN HA 1, NAN Sensilac, BEBA ExpertPro, BEBA Supreme, BEBA Comfort 1, BEBA OptiPro 1, Lactogen Harmony 1, and Alfamino. Additionally, some batches of SMA infant formula and follow-on formula that had expiration dates from October ‘26-November ‘27 were recalled by Nestlé in the UK and Ireland.

It may be appropriate to pursue damages if your baby was injured by defective infant formula. Formula can be defective in terms of its manufacturing, marketing, or design. In most cases, manufacturing defects are in some but not all of the units, while design defects, which involve flaws to the specifications for the products, are found in all units of the product.

If your child was harmed by Nestlé infant formula, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable claim for damages. We are dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post A Nestlé Infant Formula Recall Was Expanded to More than 50 Countries After Testing appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Pine-Sol Claim

In 2019, Clorox microbiologists put out a written report documenting bacterial contamination in finished product and storage tanks, which they specified was “possibly a Pseudomonad.” After that, the company got reports that certain products in stores were cloudy. Similarly, a distributor notified the company of the same problem in multiple locations. While Clorox took steps to mitigate the potential for bacterial contamination, Clorox did not immediately report to the Commission as required.

CPSC suggested that the proposed settlement sent the message that firms that delayed in reporting serious risks would risk paying significant penalties.

In 2022, the CPSC and Clorox announced together that there was a recall of the Pine-Sol scented cleaning products. The affected products were Pine-Sol Scented Multi-Surface Cleaners in Lemon Fresh, Sparking Wave, and Lavender Clean Scents. This recall specified that the recalled items might include bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an environmental organism pervasive in water and soil. Those who have weakened immune systems or have external medical devices, exposed to this bacteria, are at serious risk of infection requiring medical care.

The settlement between CPSC and Clorox included not only a $14.15 million civil penalty but also a requirement that Clorox put in place and keep internal controls and procedures intended to make sure that the company’s products comply with the Consumer Product Safety Act. Clorox also agreed that it would turn in an annual report about its internal compliance policies audit, internal controls, and compliance program. The settlement agreement is subject to public comment.

When a product causes injury or harm because of bacterial contamination or for another defect, it may be appropriate to pursue damages in a product liability lawsuit. Products can be defective in terms of their manufacturing, marketing, or design. In most cases, manufacturing defects are one-offs; that is, they are flaws that don’t affect all units of the product. Meanwhile design defects are flaws to the product’s specifications or design that occur in every unit of the product. Marketing defects most often involve a failure to warn of dangers associated with the product. In this case, the bacterial contamination seems likely to be a manufacturing defect.

If you were harmed by Pine-Sol cleaning products, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to determine whether you have a viable claim for damages. We are dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Clorox Agrees It Will Pay $14.15 Million Civil Penalty appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Organic Chia Seed Claim

The recall of Navitas Organic Chia Seeds UPC 858847000284 affects these lot codes, which are printed on the back of the sealed chia seed pouches:

• • W31025283 – Best If Used By: End APR 2027
  • W31025286 – Best If Used By: End APR 2027
  • W31025287 – Best If Used By: End APR 2027
  • W31025311 – Best If Used By: End MAY 2027
  • W31025314 – Best If Used By: End MAY 2027
  • W31025315 – Best If Used By: End MAY 2027
  • W31025316 – Best If Used By: End MAY 2027
  • W31025317 – Best If Used By: End MAY 2027

Other Navitas Organics products have not been impacted by the recall.

Salmonella is an organism that can result in significant and even fatal infections in those with weak immune systems, youth, and frail or elderly people. But even health people who get infected with Salmonella can experience symptoms like abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and fever. Occasionally, the organism can enter the bloodstream and produce more serious illnesses.

If you have an impacted pouch, you should not consume them. When the product has not been opened, it can be returned to the place where you bought it to get a refund. Alternatively, you should be able to get a product replacement by contacting 855-215-5702 between the hours of 8am and 8pm ET Monday through Friday. Navitas continues to work with the FDA on the issues of this recall.

Returning the product is an insufficient remedy if you’ve already experienced Salmonella infection as a result of the chia seeds. When there is injury or illness involved with a defective product, you may be able to pursue damages in a product liability lawsuit. Product liability lawsuits may be brought under theories of strict liability, negligence, breach of contract, breach of warranty or statutory violations. If we are able to establish liability, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages. These vary depending on the injuries involved but they can include wage loss, emotional distress, medical bills, loss of earning capacity, replacement services, and pain and suffering.

If you were harmed by Navitas chia seeds, please call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable basis to sue. Our firm is dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Navitas Organics Voluntarily Recalls Certain 8 oz. Organic Chia Seeds Lots appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Lidocaine Claim

Around 50,330 units of Mamisan Pain Relieving Topical Ointment jars with the UPC code 860006498115 were recalled. The 3.52-ounce plastic jar that holds the ointment is orange. It has a white continuous thread lid with the Mamisan trademark printed on top of the lid and label. There is also a wraparound label that has instructions and facts printed on it.

If you purchased one of these jars, you’re advised to secure the recalled jars out of children’s sight and reach. You can get a free child-resistant replacement lid from Plantimex. The product can continue to be used once the replacement lid has been put into place.

No injuries have been reported so far. However, you should be aware that lidocaine is meant to be used topically or sometimes as a local anesthetic via injection. Additionally, there is a prescription formula that may be swallowed in prescribed doses as advised by a doctor to treat throat and mouth pain. However, ingesting lidocaine can result in serious harms; it can build up in the blood and thereby impact organs. This, in turn, can result in problems in the central nervous system, such as dizziness, tinnitus, confusion, light-headedness, blurred vision, slowed breathing, seizures, and coma. Problems with the heart’s electrical system may also develop, causing slower heart rate, low blood pressure, irregular heartbeat, or sometimes a heart attack. Ingestion of lidocaine can even result in a blood disorder known as methemoglobinemia.

Small children are at a greater risk of serious injuries from consuming lidocaine—it should never be given to young children, according to FDA warnings, because there’s always a risk that the child will consume too much.

While a free replacement lid is helpful, it does nothing to address serious harms that occur as a result of lidocaine ingestion. If your child was injured by consuming lidocaine that was in one of the recalled jars, you may have grounds to sue. When we’re able to establish a manufacturer’s liability, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages. The nature of your child’s injuries will determine what damages are available. However, generally, we can recover compensation for medical bills such as ER visits, hospital stays, doctor’s bills, and the like. Additionally, we may be able to recover damages that represent noneconomic losses such as for pain and suffering and mental anguish and emotional distress.

If your child was injured because he or she ingested lidocaine due to a non-child-resistant container of Mamisan ointment, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable claim for damages. We dedicate ourselves to fighting for injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Mamisan Lidocaine Ointment Containers Are Recalled by Plantimex appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Tesla Claim

The recall covers 5,028 2025 Model 3 vehicles made between March 8-August 12, 2025, as well as 7,925 2026 Model Y vehicles that were built between March 15-August 15, 2025. The NHTSA has said that around 1% of the recalled vehicles are estimated to carry the defect.

The problem with the vehicle is that the battery pack contactor is made with an InTiCa solenoid that may suddenly open because of a bad coil termination connection. When the contactor opens while the vehicle is being driven, the driver won’t be able to apply torque to the vehicle using the accelerator pedal. This can cause a loss of propulsion, which in turn may increase the crash risk.

In the fall, Tesla had identified 36 warranty claims and 26 field reports connected to the issue. No collisions, injuries, or fatalities have been reported to the company. The manufacturer has agreed to replace the affected battery pack contactor without charging for it. If you are the owner of an impacted Tesla, you should have received a letter notifying you of this remedy after December 9.

Additionally, there is growing scrutiny of Tesla’s advanced driver assistance system. Tesla is being investigated by the NHTSA after many reports have accused its “Full Self-Driving” software of violating traffic laws that have allegedly resulted in a minimum of six crashes, four of which involved injuries. 2.88 million Tesla vehicles will be subject to investigation in this regard. There were at least 18 complaints in which the self-driving feature in the company’s cars allegedly veered into the opposite lane or ran red lights.

If you were injured because of the defective battery pack or the manufacturer’s advanced driver assistance system, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable claim for damages. If we are able to prove a Tesla’s liability for injuries or wrongful death, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on your behalf. Importantly, this compensation may reimburse you for medical expenses, lost wages, out-of-pocket costs, pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortium, and replacement services. We dedicate ourselves to fighting for injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Tesla Recalls Nearly 13,000 Vehicles Based on a Battery Pack Defect appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Waymo Lawsuit

Various communities around the country have become worried about autonomous vehicles. One school district, noting 19 separate incidents in which a Waymo vehicle passed stopped school buses since the school year started, has even asked Waymo to take its driverless cars off the road during drop off and pick up times.

Waymo claims that the incidents were caused by a software issue. It claims that it has implemented software updates to address the problem and has said that it expects it will improve. The director of product management operations has also said “I don’t think people should expect perfection.” He says that the company needs to make sure its following the rules of the road, and it has analyzed the situation with the school buses and implemented fixes to make it less likely that Waymo vehicles will pass school buses when its lights are flashing in the future.

The school buses are not the only problem that has come up in connection with Waymo Passengers have also shared videos of being unable to get out of the car. In one case, a passenger shared a video of not being able to get out of the car as it circled in a parking lot. Waymo later said that it just needed a regularly scheduled software update.

The company claims that driverless cars have a lower rate than human drivers; Waymo cars are in 91% fewer crashes that result in serious injuries and deaths than human-driven cars. However, experts from the Association for Computing Machinery has warned that it’s not clear that a fully autonomous vehicle can operate safely without the attention of a human driver except on certain restricted roads and conditions.

A Waymo accident can result in serious injuries, especially when an accident victim is a child pedestrian. The types of economic and noneconomic damages we may be able to recover depend on the nature of your injuries and losses. Car accident injuries can involve the injuries to the head, brain, spine, limbs, bones, and other parts of the body. When injuries are catastrophic, the compensation is more likely to be extensive covering both economic and noneconomic losses such as medical bills, replacement services, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of consortium.

If you were injured by a Waymo, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable claim for damages. We dedicate ourselves to fighting for injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Waymo Responds to Investigation Into School Bus Incidents appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Claim

Gold Star Distribution, Inc. has recalled hundreds of different grocery items and products because of unsanitary conditions at its storage facility in Minneapolis. There are so many products that they are listed over 44 pages, so they cannot all be listed here. However, some well-known products that are affected include Dole pineapple slices, Haribo products, Gummi savers, Maruchan ramen, Jolly Ranchers, Saltine crackers, many flavors of Pringles, Quaker products, Werther’s, Lifesavers, Hershey’s products, Enfamil infant formula, Reese’s products, Arizona iced tea, and more.

Consumers may face serious health risks as a result of exposure to the affected products. Even contacting packaging that’s been contaminated with rodent droppings can result in someone getting sick; rodents carry Leptospira, which is the bacteria that causes leptospirosis. If someone develops leptospirosis that goes untreated, he or she can suffer kidney damage, liver failure, meningitis, difficulty breathing or even death. Symptoms can include rash, chills, headache, jaundice, body or muscle aches, red eyes, nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, and diarrhea.

If you have come into contact with a product affected by the recall, you should not only thoroughly wash your own hands, but you should also disinfect surfaces that have contacted the product.

You should not destroy a product if you’ve developed an illness that you believe was caused by a product that was subject to this major recall, since it may be evidence. However, you can obtain a refund by writing to Gold Star and providing your receipt for the purchase. You can also contact Gold Star from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Central Standard Time, if you have questions, and you can report adverse reactions to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program online or by regular mail or fax.

Food poisoning can result in serious harms, especially if the person who consumed affected food is part of a vulnerable population, such as those who are minors, those who are older adults, and those who are immune suppressed. If we are able to establish liability, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages, such as medical bills, lost wages, replacement services, loss of earning capacity, mental anguish, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium.

If you were harmed by food made in unsanitary conditions, call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group for a consultation to determine whether you have a viable claim for damages. We are dedicated to fighting for injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Unsanitary Conditions Generate a Major Recall Across Food Brands appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.

Call Moll Law Group About Your Child’s Bike Helmet Claim

Two models of Outdoor Master children’s and youth bicycle/multipurpose helmets are affected by the recall. They were sold online at Amazon.com and Walmart.com from June 2024-February 2025 for $20-$32. One of the models is OM-TD BIKE; it’s blue with a dinosaur print and has a black plastic adjustable knob at the back of the helmet, as well as black straps, a black buckle, and black padding. It comes in children’s size small and fits a head circumference of 48-52 cm. The other model is OM-TD BIKE with the manufacturing month of 05/2024 printed on a label inside the helmet. The bran is printed on the back of the helmet. These are green helmets with a black plastic knob, a black buckle, black padding, and yellow straps. It is sold in youth size small and fits those with a head circumference of 46-52 cm.

You should check your child’s helmet for these markers to determine whether they have been recalled; you can get a full refund from Outdoor Master by contacting them. However, the remedy may be insufficient if your child was injured or died in a bike accident involving the helmet. It may be appropriate to pursue damages in a product liability lawsuit in the event that there are injuries or death involved. Theories of liability under which we may be able to recover damages include negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, breach of contract, and statutory violations.

In a case in which we assert negligence, we would need to show (1) the manufacturer owed you a duty to act within a certain standard of care, (2) the manufacturer breached that duty or standard of care, (3) the breach caused your injuries, and (4) you experienced damages as a result.

Sometimes there are multiple causes of injuries. For example, injuries could be the result of a bicycle accident involving a defective bicycle helmet and a negligent driver. In those cases, we would ask the court to apportion fault. Different states follow a range of distinct rules to how fault is apportioned and from whom damages may be recovered. This can make a difference when one or more defendants lack the funds to pay a damages award. Illinois follows a modified rule of joint and several liability, which means that all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for a plaintiff’s past and future medical and medically related expenses. Defendants who are found 25% or more liable are jointly and severally liable for all damages, and the plaintiff can pursue the full amount of damages from any one defendant that is 25% or more liable regardless of how at fault they are. However, a defendant whose fault is less than 25% is only severally responsible, or proportionately responsible, for nonmedical damages.

If your child was injured as a result of the affected bicycle helmets, you should call the seasoned Chicago-based product liability lawyers of Moll Law Group to figure out whether you have a viable claim for damages.  When our firm can prove a manufacturer’s liability for injuries or wrongful death, we may be able to recover economic and noneconomic damages on behalf of our clients; this compensation can cover medical expenses, lost wages, out-of-pocket costs, pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortium, and replacement services. We dedicate ourselves to fighting for injured consumers around the country. Complete our online form or call us at 312.462.1700.

The post Recall of Outdoor Master Children’s and Youth Helmets appeared first on Illinois Injury and Mass Tort Lawyer Blog.