<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Jersey Lawyers Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Published by New Jersey Attorneys — McLaughlin &#38; Nardi, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">119184609</site>	<item>
		<title>New Jersey Real Estate Law Decision Examines Difference Between Analysis of Adverse Possession and Proscriptive Easements</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-real-estate-law-decision-examines-difference-between-analysis-of-adverse-possession-and-proscriptive-easements/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Real Estate Attorneys"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ real estate litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squatters rights in NJ]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s easy to think that under New Jersey real estate law, “squatter’s rights” is a thing of the past.  However, it is very much alive, although very difficult to prove.  There are two similar ways to obtain an interest in property owned by another, through either adverse possession or a prescriptive easement.  While the requirements [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s easy to think that under New Jersey real estate law, “squatter’s rights” is a thing of the past.  However, it is very much alive, although very difficult to prove.  There are two similar ways to obtain an interest in property owned by another, through either adverse possession or a prescriptive easement.  While the requirements for each are similar are similar, they are still different.  These requirements were recently examined in a New Jersey appeals court decision in the case of <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7900194835103020078&amp;q=shea+v+dipopolp&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,31">Shea vs DiPopolo</a>.<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2370 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-225x300.jpg" alt="woods-225x300" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-225x300.jpg 225w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-90x120.jpg 90w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/07/woods-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></p>
<p>Kenneth and Catherine Ann Shea purchased a home on Columbia Turnpike in Florham Park, New Jersey in 2003.  The survey showed that their horseshoe shaped driveway, both ends of which connect to Columbia Turnpike, ran onto the edge of the neighboring property.  The Shea’s house was built in 1981, and aerial photographs show that the driveway was in use and going over the neighbor’s property since at least April 19, 1990.  It was originally gravel, but the Sheas paved it between 2005 and 2007.   They .used it until 2021 when their neighbors Romo and Dolores DiPopolo, sent a letter telling them to stop using it and then put a fence up barring their access.</p>
<p>The DiPopolos bought the neighboring property in 2001.  It vacant until they built a house there and moved into it in 2016.  The DiPopolos also owned the property behind it.  They developed that property in 2004 and 2005, using the disputed driveway – which ran on both properties – to move the construction equipment used in the development.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-real-estate-law-decision-examines-difference-between-analysis-of-adverse-possession-and-proscriptive-easements/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Real Estate Law Decision Examines Difference Between Analysis of Adverse Possession and Proscriptive Easements" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2368</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Examines When Marijuana Use by New Jersey Law Enforcement Officers Can Justify Termination – and When it Can’t</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-examines-when-marijuana-use-by-new-jersey-law-enforcement-officers-can-justify-termination-and-when-it-cant/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Civil Service Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey civil service attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey police marijuana discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ employment lawyers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An appellate court recently issued two opinions in appeals from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission regarding the termination of three police officers sought by the Jersey City Police Department because the officers were positive for marijuana use in urinalysis tests.  In the decisions, the court set a line between when termination is allowed and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An appellate court recently issued two opinions in appeals from the New Jersey Civil Service Commission regarding the termination of three police officers sought by the Jersey City Police Department because the officers were positive for marijuana use in urinalysis tests.  In the decisions, the court set a line between when termination is allowed and when prohibited under New Jersey’s regulation of marijuana use.<img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1909 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2022/01/joe-b-300x200.jpg" alt="joe-b-300x200" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2022/01/joe-b-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2022/01/joe-b-180x120.jpg 180w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2022/01/joe-b.jpg 604w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Three Positive Urinalysis Tests </strong></h3>
<p>The three officers, Norhan Mansour, Omar Polanco and Montavious Patten, all had positive results for marijuana from urinalysis tests.  In subsequent interviews with Jersey City Police Department Internal Affairs investigators, they admitted the use.  Officers Mansour said that he had purchased the marijuana at a legal dispensary and produced receipts.  Officer Polanco also stated that he had purchased the marijuana at a legal dispensary but did not have receipts.  Officer Patten purchased the marijuana from a friend named “Sal,” who told Patten that he had purchased it from a legal dispensary.  There was no allegation that the officers were under the influence of marijuana on the job.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-examines-when-marijuana-use-by-new-jersey-law-enforcement-officers-can-justify-termination-and-when-it-cant/"  title="Continue Reading Appeals Court Examines When Marijuana Use by New Jersey Law Enforcement Officers Can Justify Termination – and When it Can’t" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2364</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Civil Service List Removal Because of Psychological Test Results Appeals Procedures Examined by Appellate Court</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-civil-service-list-removal-because-of-psychological-test-results-appeals-procedures-examined-by-appellate-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Civil Service Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Civil Service Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Jersey Civil Service List Removal Appeals Under New Jersey civil service law, employment decisions, including hiring, must be based solely on merit.  The civil service system therefore employs examinations which objectively test a candidate’s fitness.  Successful candidates are then placed on a hiring list in order of their scores, with certain preferences for veterans.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>New Jersey Civil Service List Removal Appeals</strong></h3>
<p>Under New Jersey civil service law, employment decisions, including hiring, must be based solely on merit.  The civil service system therefore employs examinations which objectively test a candidate’s fitness.  Successful candidates are then placed on a hiring list in order of their scores, with certain preferences for veterans.  New employees must then be hired off the list in order of their placement, subject to the Rule of Three.  Candidates for positions as <a href="https://www.esqnj.com/practice-areas/employment-law_1/labor-employment-law-representing-public-sector-employees/police-and-law-enforcement-officers/">law enforcement officers</a> or fire <a href="https://www.esqnj.com/practice-areas/employment-law_1/labor-employment-law-representing-public-sector-employees/firefighters/">fighters</a> includes testing of their psychological fitness.  A candidate may be removed from<img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2129 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-300x225.jpg" alt="7-300x225" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-1000x750.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/7-160x120.jpg 160w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /> a hiring list for failure of these examinations.</p>
<p>However, because New Jersey’s civil service laws are designed to ensure that employment decisions are based on merit and not because of favoritism, nepotism or discrimination, there is a robust due process procedure for list removal appeals.   The candidate first appeals his removal from the list with the New Jersey Civil Service Commission.  Thereafter, the unsuccessful party may appeal an unfavorable decision to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, and then ultimately to the New Jersey <a href="https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/supreme">Supreme Court</a> (which only hears a small, select number of appeals).</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-civil-service-list-removal-because-of-psychological-test-results-appeals-procedures-examined-by-appellate-court/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Civil Service List Removal Because of Psychological Test Results Appeals Procedures Examined by Appellate Court" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2358</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>McLaughlin &#038; Nardi, LLC Named to New Jersey Super Lawyers Top 100 List</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/mclaughlin-nardi-llc-named-to-new-jersey-super-lawyers-top-100-list/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey A-901 Application Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid Waste Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ business lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Construction Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[McLaughlin &#38; Nardi, LLC is pleased to announce that Maurice McLaughlin was named to the “Top 100: New Jersey Super Lawyers” list in the 2026 edition of New Jersey Super Lawyers*.  Maurice has been included on the Super Lawyers list since 2012 before being named to the Top 100 list this year.  In addition, Pauline [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McLaughlin &amp; Nardi, LLC is pleased to announce that Maurice McLaughlin was named to the “Top 100: New Jersey Super Lawyers” list in the 2026 edition of New Jersey Super Lawyers*.  Maurice has been included on the Super Lawyers list since 2012 before being named to the Top 100 list this year.  In addition, Pauline Young was included on the New Jersey Super Lawyers list from 2020-2025.<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2355 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/06/law-firm-2-300x184.png" alt="law-firm-2-300x184" width="300" height="184" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/06/law-firm-2-300x184.png 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/06/law-firm-2-768x471.png 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/06/law-firm-2-195x120.png 195w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/06/law-firm-2.png 896w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p>Super Lawyers’ selection criteria is as follows.  “Super Lawyers selects attorneys using a patented multiphase selection process. Peer nominations and evaluations are combined with independent research. Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement. Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis. The objective is to create a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource for attorneys and consumers searching for legal counsel. Since Super Lawyers is intended to be used as an aid in selecting a lawyer, we limit the lawyer ratings to those who can be hired and retained by the public… The final published list represents the top 5 percent of lawyers in the state. The lists are published annually in state and regional editions of Super Lawyers magazines and in inserts and special advertising sections in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers. All attorneys selected for inclusion in Super Lawyers, regardless of year, can be found on SuperLawyers.com.”</p>
<p><a href="https://www.esqnj.com/lawyers/maurice-w-mclaughlin/">Maurice</a>, with <a href="https://www.esqnj.com/lawyers/frank-p-nardi/">Frank Nardi</a>, founded the law firm in 2002, and practices in employment, commercial and <a href="https://www.esqnj.com/practice-areas/business-services-practice/construction-law/">construction</a> litigation.  He is also a mediator appointed by the Superior Court to mediate civil litigation.  Maurice is the author of the book <em>New Jersey Public Employment Law</em> published by Gann Law Books, now in its 14<sup>th</sup> edition.  Maurice is admitted to the state bars in New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts, and the United States Supreme Court.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/mclaughlin-nardi-llc-named-to-new-jersey-super-lawyers-top-100-list/"  title="Continue Reading McLaughlin &amp; Nardi, LLC Named to New Jersey Super Lawyers Top 100 List" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2354</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Clarifies Identification of Violated Regulations Required under Whistleblower Law</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-clarifies-identification-of-violated-regulations-required-under-whistleblower-law/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Whistleblower Law"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ whistleblower attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Background John Sloan was an employee of Cape Regional Medical Center and Cape Regional Health System, Inc. (collectively “Cape”), from February 2018 until October 2020, serving as director of plant operations.  His duties included making sure that the facility’s maintenance, repair and safety systems were in compliance with their legal requirements. Sloan made complaints to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3></h3>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>John Sloan was an employee of Cape Regional Medical Center and Cape Regional Health System, Inc. (collectively “Cape”), from February 2018 until October 2020, serving as director of plant operations.  His duties included making sure that the facility’s maintenance, repair and safety systems were in compliance with their legal requirements.</p>
<p>Sloan made complaints to his supervisors that defendants had not complied with fire-safety regulations by failing to inspect fires extinguishers, exit lights and sprinkler systems (the “fire<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2128 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg" alt="6-300x225" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1000x750.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-160x120.jpg 160w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /> complaints”), particularly during the increased patient load and decreased staffing caused by Covid.  He also complained about the temperature and humidity levels in the operating rooms and electrical work in the sewage ejector pit (“the safety complaints”).  He alleged that he was told to ignore the violations and threatened with discipline if he did not, and that he was yelled at and false accusations were made about his work performance.  Eventually he was fired on October 16, 2020.  He claimed that he was terminated in retaliation for his complaints about the defendants’ legal and regulatory violations.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-clarifies-identification-of-violated-regulations-required-under-whistleblower-law/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Clarifies Identification of Violated Regulations Required under Whistleblower Law" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2351</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Does Not Apply to Architects, Appeals Court Says’</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-consumer-fraud-act-does-not-apply-to-architects-appeals-court-says/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Construction Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ business lawyers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Under New Jersey construction law, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act applies to most residential and commercial construction projects.  It is applicable to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.  However, a New Jersey Appeals Court held in a recent decision that architects are not subject to the Consumer Fraud Act because of the “learned professional” exemption. Background [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under New Jersey construction law, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act applies to most residential and commercial construction projects.  It is applicable to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.  However, a New Jersey Appeals Court held in a recent decision that architects are not subject to the Consumer Fraud Act because of the “learned professional” exemption.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2128 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg" alt="6-300x225" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1000x750.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-160x120.jpg 160w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>The Borough of Caldwell contracted with Cozzarelli Cirminiello Architects, LLC for architectural services including design, construction and rehabilitation of Borough-owned facilities.  CCA’s invoices were approved by municipal officials before being submitted to and approved by the Council before they were paid.  After a new Council was elected, the Borough terminated its contracts with CCA.  Caldwell then sued CCA in the Law Division of the <a href="https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/superior-court-clerks-office">Superior Court</a> of New Jersey in Essex County for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of the New Jersey <a href="https://www.njconsumeraffairs.gov/statutes/consumer-fraud-act.pdf">Consumer Fraud Act</a>. Caldwell claimed that CCA failed to perform its services, failed to produce “products,” failed to support the Borough on construction bids, failed to produce construction documents, double billed the Borough, and billed it above the agreed upon rate.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-consumer-fraud-act-does-not-apply-to-architects-appeals-court-says/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Does Not Apply to Architects, Appeals Court Says’" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2346</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Strikes Down Background Circumstances Rule in Reverse Discrimination Lawsuits Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Federal Court</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-strikes-down-background-circumstances-rule-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits-under-the-new-jersey-law-against-discrimination-in-federal-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ discrimination attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Background: Anti-Discrimination Statutes and the Background Circumstances Rule Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination both prohibit employers from illegally discriminating against their employees.  Normally the evaluation is straightforward under the McDonnell Douglas Test.  However, in the case of reverse discrimination, i.e., where an [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Background: Anti-Discrimination Statutes and the Background Circumstances Rule</strong></h3>
<p>Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination both prohibit employers from illegally discriminating against their employees.  Normally the evaluation is straightforward under the <em><a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14185226792508953727&amp;q=massey+v.+bergenfield&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=3,31">McDonnell Douglas</a> </em>Test.  However, in the case of reverse discrimination, i.e., where an employer is accused of discriminating against an employee who is in the majority, New Jersey and<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2101 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183.jpg" alt="paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183" width="300" height="183" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1024x623.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-768x467.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1536x935.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1000x609.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-197x120.jpg 197w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew.jpg 1903w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /> many Federal courts imposed a higher burden of proof on the employee.  In cases of reverse discrimination, employees in New Jersey state courts and many federal courts had to satisfy the “Background Circumstances Rule,” which requires that the employee prove that he “has been victimized by the unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”  However, in 2025, the United States Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Background Circumstances Rule in <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964">Title VII</a> cases in the case of <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8185333361058795195&amp;q=Ames+v.+Ohio+Department+of+Youth+Services&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=3,31">Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services</a>.</p>
<h3><strong>The U.S. Supreme Court Steps In</strong></h3>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-strikes-down-background-circumstances-rule-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits-under-the-new-jersey-law-against-discrimination-in-federal-court/"  title="Continue Reading Appeals Court Strikes Down Background Circumstances Rule in Reverse Discrimination Lawsuits Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Federal Court" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2343</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Rejects Argument that Public Employee’s Subsequent Employment Relieves Employer from Having to Pay Amounts in Separation Agreement</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-rejects-argument-that-public-employees-subsequent-employment-relieves-employer-from-having-to-pay-amounts-in-separation-agreement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey separation agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Appellate Division examined a town’s termination of payments to its former employee under a separation agreement when the employee became employed by another town. Background Alberto Cabrera was the municipal clerk of the Town of Guttenberg, New Jersey.  As so often happens, the parties wished to terminate their relationship.  They entered into [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Jersey Appellate Division examined a town’s termination of payments to its former employee under a separation agreement when the employee became employed by another town.</p>
<h3><strong>Background<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2126 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-225x300.jpg" alt="4-225x300" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-225x300.jpg 225w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-90x120.jpg 90w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></strong></h3>
<p>Alberto Cabrera was the municipal clerk of the Town of Guttenberg, New Jersey.  As so often happens, the parties wished to terminate their relationship.  They entered into a Separation Agreement which provided that Cabrera would stop performing his duties and go on paid leave beginning on August 18, 2022, and the leave would terminate with his retirement on March 31, 2023.  He would be on the payroll and paid his regular salary by the Town through that day.  He would continue to get medical benefits through March 31, 2023.  The Town would also pay him his accrued but unused vacation, sick, compensatory and personal days for 2022 and 2023.  Cabrera agreed to submit a letter requesting this paid leave of absence, which he did the same day.  The Town’s Mayor and Council voted to approve the agreement.  Cabrera inquired about amending the agreement once, but it was never changed in any way.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-rejects-argument-that-public-employees-subsequent-employment-relieves-employer-from-having-to-pay-amounts-in-separation-agreement/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Rejects Argument that Public Employee’s Subsequent Employment Relieves Employer from Having to Pay Amounts in Separation Agreement" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2341</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Examines the Effect of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act on Litigation of Related Non-Sexual Harassment Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-the-effect-of-the-ending-forced-arbitration-of-sexual-assault-and-sexual-harassment-act-on-litigation-of-related-non-sexual-harassment-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey employment litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey sexual harassment lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ arbitration attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act The New Jersey Arbitration Act and Federal Arbitration Act generally require enforcement of agreements to arbitrate disputes.  This extends to the enforcement of arbitration agreements in employment contracts. However, in response to the #MeToo Movement, Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act</strong></h3>
<p>The <a href="https://codes.findlaw.com/nj/title-2a-administration-of-civil-and-criminal-justice/nj-st-sect-2a-23b-23/">New Jersey Arbitration Act</a> and <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/9">Federal Arbitration Act</a> generally require enforcement of agreements to arbitrate disputes.  This extends to the enforcement of arbitration agreements in employment contracts.</p>
<p>However, in response to the #MeToo Movement, Congress passed the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4445/text">Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021</a>.  The EFAA provided:<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1498 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200.jpg" alt="new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-768x512.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-1000x667.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-180x120.jpg 180w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-the-effect-of-the-ending-forced-arbitration-of-sexual-assault-and-sexual-harassment-act-on-litigation-of-related-non-sexual-harassment-claims/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Examines the Effect of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act on Litigation of Related Non-Sexual Harassment Claims" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2339</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Are Pleased to Welcome Judge Peter F. Boggia to the Firm</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/we-are-pleased-to-welcome-judge-peter-f-boggia-to-the-firm/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLaughlin &#38; Nardi, LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey alternative dispute resolution"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Arbitration"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Mediation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[McLaughlin &#38; Nardi is pleased to announce that the Honorable Peter F. Boggia, a retired judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, will be joining the firm as of counsel.  Judge Boggia will be concentrating his practice on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation and arbitration.  His relationship with our attorneys goes back over thirty [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McLaughlin &amp; Nardi is pleased to announce that the Honorable Peter F. Boggia, a retired judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, will be joining the firm as of counsel.  Judge Boggia will be concentrating his practice on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation and arbitration.  His relationship with our attorneys goes back over thirty years to when Frank Nardi served as his intern while Judge Boggia was on the bench, and the judge occasionally agreed with Maurice McLaughlin’s arguments when he appeared before him.<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2337 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-240x300.jpg" alt="photo-jpeg-240x300" width="240" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-240x300.jpg 240w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-819x1024.jpg 819w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-768x960.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-800x1000.jpg 800w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-96x120.jpg 96w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg.jpg 918w" sizes="(max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px" /></p>
<p>Judge Boggia served on the Superior Court bench for more than twenty years in the Civil Division, both as trial judge and acting presiding civil judge, handling complex trials, including class actions, product liability, medical malpractice and serious personal injury claims.  He also helped settle hundreds of civil cases before trial, and instituted the first mediation program in the Bergen County Superior Court.</p>
<p>Prior to his appointment to the Superior Court bench, Judge Boggia served as Law Clerk to the Honorable Arthur J. O’Dea in the New Jersey Superior Court, and as an assistant prosecutor in Bergen County, handling serious criminal cases. He was House Counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and in that position tried hundreds of cases and earned the distinction of Certified Trial Attorney.  Judge Boggia sat concurrently as Municipal Judge in the Bergen County communities of Little Ferry, Leonia, Maywood, Bogota, and Fairview, New Jersey.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/we-are-pleased-to-welcome-judge-peter-f-boggia-to-the-firm/"  title="Continue Reading We Are Pleased to Welcome Judge Peter F. Boggia to the Firm" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2336</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Requested URI is rejected) 

Served from: www.newjerseylawyersblog.com @ 2026-08-10 12:36:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->