<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Jersey Lawyers Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/</link>
	<description>Published by New Jersey Attorneys — McLaughlin &#38; Nardi, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">119184609</site>	<item>
		<title>New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Does Not Apply to Architects, Appeals Court Says’</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-consumer-fraud-act-does-not-apply-to-architects-appeals-court-says/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Construction Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ business lawyers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Under New Jersey construction law, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act applies to most residential and commercial construction projects.  It is applicable to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.  However, a New Jersey Appeals Court held in a recent decision that architects are not subject to the Consumer Fraud Act because of the “learned professional” exemption. Background [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under New Jersey construction law, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act applies to most residential and commercial construction projects.  It is applicable to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.  However, a New Jersey Appeals Court held in a recent decision that architects are not subject to the Consumer Fraud Act because of the “learned professional” exemption.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2128 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg" alt="6-300x225" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1000x750.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-160x120.jpg 160w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>The Borough of Caldwell contracted with Cozzarelli Cirminiello Architects, LLC for architectural services including design, construction and rehabilitation of Borough-owned facilities.  CCA’s invoices were approved by municipal officials before being submitted to and approved by the Council before they were paid.  After a new Council was elected, the Borough terminated its contracts with CCA.  Caldwell then sued CCA in the Law Division of the <a href="https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/superior-court-clerks-office">Superior Court</a> of New Jersey in Essex County for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of the New Jersey <a href="https://www.njconsumeraffairs.gov/statutes/consumer-fraud-act.pdf">Consumer Fraud Act</a>. Caldwell claimed that CCA failed to perform its services, failed to produce “products,” failed to support the Borough on construction bids, failed to produce construction documents, double billed the Borough, and billed it above the agreed upon rate.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-consumer-fraud-act-does-not-apply-to-architects-appeals-court-says/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Does Not Apply to Architects, Appeals Court Says’" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2346</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Strikes Down Background Circumstances Rule in Reverse Discrimination Lawsuits Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Federal Court</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-strikes-down-background-circumstances-rule-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits-under-the-new-jersey-law-against-discrimination-in-federal-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ discrimination attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Background: Anti-Discrimination Statutes and the Background Circumstances Rule Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination both prohibit employers from illegally discriminating against their employees.  Normally the evaluation is straightforward under the McDonnell Douglas Test.  However, in the case of reverse discrimination, i.e., where an [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Background: Anti-Discrimination Statutes and the Background Circumstances Rule</strong></h3>
<p>Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination both prohibit employers from illegally discriminating against their employees.  Normally the evaluation is straightforward under the <em><a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14185226792508953727&amp;q=massey+v.+bergenfield&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=3,31">McDonnell Douglas</a> </em>Test.  However, in the case of reverse discrimination, i.e., where an employer is accused of discriminating against an employee who is in the majority, New Jersey and<img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2101 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183.jpg" alt="paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183" width="300" height="183" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-300x183.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1024x623.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-768x467.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1536x935.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-1000x609.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew-197x120.jpg 197w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-john-and-andrew.jpg 1903w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /> many Federal courts imposed a higher burden of proof on the employee.  In cases of reverse discrimination, employees in New Jersey state courts and many federal courts had to satisfy the “Background Circumstances Rule,” which requires that the employee prove that he “has been victimized by the unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.”  However, in 2025, the United States Supreme Court unanimously struck down the Background Circumstances Rule in <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964">Title VII</a> cases in the case of <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8185333361058795195&amp;q=Ames+v.+Ohio+Department+of+Youth+Services&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=3,31">Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services</a>.</p>
<h3><strong>The U.S. Supreme Court Steps In</strong></h3>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/appeals-court-strikes-down-background-circumstances-rule-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits-under-the-new-jersey-law-against-discrimination-in-federal-court/"  title="Continue Reading Appeals Court Strikes Down Background Circumstances Rule in Reverse Discrimination Lawsuits Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination in Federal Court" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2343</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Rejects Argument that Public Employee’s Subsequent Employment Relieves Employer from Having to Pay Amounts in Separation Agreement</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-rejects-argument-that-public-employees-subsequent-employment-relieves-employer-from-having-to-pay-amounts-in-separation-agreement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey separation agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Appellate Division examined a town’s termination of payments to its former employee under a separation agreement when the employee became employed by another town. Background Alberto Cabrera was the municipal clerk of the Town of Guttenberg, New Jersey.  As so often happens, the parties wished to terminate their relationship.  They entered into [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Jersey Appellate Division examined a town’s termination of payments to its former employee under a separation agreement when the employee became employed by another town.</p>
<h3><strong>Background<img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2126 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-225x300.jpg" alt="4-225x300" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-225x300.jpg 225w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-90x120.jpg 90w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/4-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></strong></h3>
<p>Alberto Cabrera was the municipal clerk of the Town of Guttenberg, New Jersey.  As so often happens, the parties wished to terminate their relationship.  They entered into a Separation Agreement which provided that Cabrera would stop performing his duties and go on paid leave beginning on August 18, 2022, and the leave would terminate with his retirement on March 31, 2023.  He would be on the payroll and paid his regular salary by the Town through that day.  He would continue to get medical benefits through March 31, 2023.  The Town would also pay him his accrued but unused vacation, sick, compensatory and personal days for 2022 and 2023.  Cabrera agreed to submit a letter requesting this paid leave of absence, which he did the same day.  The Town’s Mayor and Council voted to approve the agreement.  Cabrera inquired about amending the agreement once, but it was never changed in any way.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-rejects-argument-that-public-employees-subsequent-employment-relieves-employer-from-having-to-pay-amounts-in-separation-agreement/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Rejects Argument that Public Employee’s Subsequent Employment Relieves Employer from Having to Pay Amounts in Separation Agreement" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2341</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Examines the Effect of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act on Litigation of Related Non-Sexual Harassment Claims</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-the-effect-of-the-ending-forced-arbitration-of-sexual-assault-and-sexual-harassment-act-on-litigation-of-related-non-sexual-harassment-claims/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey employment litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey sexual harassment lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ arbitration attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act The New Jersey Arbitration Act and Federal Arbitration Act generally require enforcement of agreements to arbitrate disputes.  This extends to the enforcement of arbitration agreements in employment contracts. However, in response to the #MeToo Movement, Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act</strong></h3>
<p>The <a href="https://codes.findlaw.com/nj/title-2a-administration-of-civil-and-criminal-justice/nj-st-sect-2a-23b-23/">New Jersey Arbitration Act</a> and <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/9">Federal Arbitration Act</a> generally require enforcement of agreements to arbitrate disputes.  This extends to the enforcement of arbitration agreements in employment contracts.</p>
<p>However, in response to the #MeToo Movement, Congress passed the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4445/text">Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021</a>.  The EFAA provided:<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1498 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200.jpg" alt="new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-768x512.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-1000x667.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS-180x120.jpg 180w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2020/02/new-york-county-courthouse-1540991328RMS.jpg 1920w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-the-effect-of-the-ending-forced-arbitration-of-sexual-assault-and-sexual-harassment-act-on-litigation-of-related-non-sexual-harassment-claims/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Examines the Effect of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act on Litigation of Related Non-Sexual Harassment Claims" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2339</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Are Pleased to Welcome Judge Peter F. Boggia to the Firm</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/we-are-pleased-to-welcome-judge-peter-f-boggia-to-the-firm/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLaughlin &#38; Nardi, LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey alternative dispute resolution"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Arbitration"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Mediation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[McLaughlin &#38; Nardi is pleased to announce that the Honorable Peter F. Boggia, a retired judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, will be joining the firm as of counsel.  Judge Boggia will be concentrating his practice on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation and arbitration.  His relationship with our attorneys goes back over thirty [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McLaughlin &amp; Nardi is pleased to announce that the Honorable Peter F. Boggia, a retired judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, will be joining the firm as of counsel.  Judge Boggia will be concentrating his practice on alternative dispute resolution, particularly mediation and arbitration.  His relationship with our attorneys goes back over thirty years to when Frank Nardi served as his intern while Judge Boggia was on the bench, and the judge occasionally agreed with Maurice McLaughlin’s arguments when he appeared before him.<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2337 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-240x300.jpg" alt="photo-jpeg-240x300" width="240" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-240x300.jpg 240w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-819x1024.jpg 819w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-768x960.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-800x1000.jpg 800w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg-96x120.jpg 96w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2026/02/photo-jpeg.jpg 918w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px" /></p>
<p>Judge Boggia served on the Superior Court bench for more than twenty years in the Civil Division, both as trial judge and acting presiding civil judge, handling complex trials, including class actions, product liability, medical malpractice and serious personal injury claims.  He also helped settle hundreds of civil cases before trial, and instituted the first mediation program in the Bergen County Superior Court.</p>
<p>Prior to his appointment to the Superior Court bench, Judge Boggia served as Law Clerk to the Honorable Arthur J. O’Dea in the New Jersey Superior Court, and as an assistant prosecutor in Bergen County, handling serious criminal cases. He was House Counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and in that position tried hundreds of cases and earned the distinction of Certified Trial Attorney.  Judge Boggia sat concurrently as Municipal Judge in the Bergen County communities of Little Ferry, Leonia, Maywood, Bogota, and Fairview, New Jersey.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/we-are-pleased-to-welcome-judge-peter-f-boggia-to-the-firm/"  title="Continue Reading We Are Pleased to Welcome Judge Peter F. Boggia to the Firm" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2336</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey State Board of Examiners Authority to Revoke or Suspend Teaching Certificates Examined by Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-state-board-of-examiners-authority-to-revoke-or-suspend-teaching-certificates-examined-by-supreme-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 21:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Employment Lawyers"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys for NJ teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ Teaching Certificate Attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The State Board of Examiners, which operates within the New Jersey Department of Education, is the agency charged with licensing New Jersey educators.  It determines educator fitness and issues certifications required for New Jersey teachers and other teaching staff members.  It also has the authority to revoke or suspend certificates in appropriate circumstances.  The New [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Board of Examiners, which operates within the New Jersey Department of Education, is the agency charged with licensing New Jersey educators.  It determines educator fitness and issues certifications required for New Jersey teachers and other teaching staff members.  It also has the authority to revoke or suspend certificates in appropriate circumstances.  The New Jersey Supreme Court recently examined the limits of the Board’s authority in the case of <em>In the Matter of the Certificates of Nicholas Cilento, State Board of Examiners, New Jersey Department of<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2212 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-225x300.jpg" alt="tess-225x300" width="225" height="300" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-225x300.jpg 225w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-768x1024.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-1536x2048.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-750x1000.jpg 750w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-90x120.jpg 90w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2024/09/tess-scaled.jpg 1920w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /> Education</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>Nicholas Cilento was a special education teacher with the Woodbridge Township School District.  On May 21, 2019, he was relieved of his teaching responsibilities because it was alleged that he consumed alcohol on school grounds.  <a href="https://www.esqnj.com/practice-areas/employment-law_1/labor-employment-law-representing-public-sector-employees/teachers-principals-superintendents-administrators-and-other-edu/tenure-for-teachers-principals-school-nurses-and-other-teaching/">Tenure</a> charges were filed in November 2019.  Cilento appealed the charges and after an evidentiary hearing in which Cilento admitted struggling with alcoholism and consuming alcohol on school grounds, an arbitrator upheld charges of conduct unbecoming, violations of state and municipal law, violations of District policy.  The arbitrator imposed a three-month unpaid suspension and reinstatement on a “last chance” basis.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-state-board-of-examiners-authority-to-revoke-or-suspend-teaching-certificates-examined-by-supreme-court/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey State Board of Examiners Authority to Revoke or Suspend Teaching Certificates Examined by Supreme Court" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2332</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Examines Effect of Conviction on Police Officer’s Law Enforcement License</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-effect-of-conviction-on-police-officers-law-enforcement-license/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Service Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey civil service attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey employment attonreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ law enforcement officer attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A New Jersey employment law decision recently examined the effect of a conviction under the newly enacted New Jersey Police Training Act and with the New Jersey Police Training Commission in the case of Garcia vs. New Jersey Police Training Commission.  Background Gregory Gacia was a police officer with the Wharton, New Jersey, Police Department.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey employment law decision recently examined the effect of a conviction under the newly enacted New Jersey Police Training Act and with the New Jersey Police Training Commission in the case of <em>Garcia vs. New Jersey Police Training Commission. </em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2100 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-300x211.jpg" alt="paterson-pd-andrew-300x211" width="300" height="211" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-300x211.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-1024x721.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-768x541.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-1536x1081.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-1000x704.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew-170x120.jpg 170w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/09/paterson-pd-andrew.jpg 1918w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>Gregory Gacia was a police officer with the Wharton, New Jersey, Police Department.  As a result of a search of his residence, he was charged with false representations and gun possession offenses.  Thereafter, on November 14, 2022, he entered into a plea agreement whereby he pled guilty to one count of possessing a large capacity ammunition magazine in the fourth degree.  He was sentenced to one year of probation, with the judgment of conviction entered on January 13, 2023.  Garcia appealed his decision to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, when affirmed his conviction on October 7, 2024.  He thereafter appealed to the Supreme Courts of New Jersey and the United States, both of which refused to hear his appeal.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-examines-effect-of-conviction-on-police-officers-law-enforcement-license/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Examines Effect of Conviction on Police Officer’s Law Enforcement License" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2329</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to Give Timely Written Notice of Non-Renewal Requires Reinstatement of Non-Tenured New Jersey Educator</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/failure-to-give-timely-written-notice-of-non-renewal-requires-reinstatement-of-non-tenured-new-jersey-educator/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey employment law."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donaldson Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Employment Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protections for non-tenured teachers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Jersey employment law provides that non-tenured educators must receive written notice that their employment contracts will not be renewed by May 15th or their contracts will be deemed to be renewed for the coming school year.  A New Jersey appeals court recently issued a decision examining the procedure and consequences of the non-renewal of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey employment law provides that non-tenured educators must receive written notice that their employment contracts will not be renewed by May 15<sup>th</sup> or their contracts will be deemed to be renewed for the coming school year.  A New Jersey appeals court recently issued a decision examining the procedure and consequences of the non-renewal of an assistant principal after failing to give her the required timely written notice in the case of <em>Adeyin vs. Board of Education of the City of Orange</em>.<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-554 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/01/supreme-court-building-1209701__340-300x200.jpg" alt="supreme-court-building-1209701__340-300x200" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/01/supreme-court-building-1209701__340-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/01/supreme-court-building-1209701__340-180x120.jpg 180w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/01/supreme-court-building-1209701__340.jpg 510w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>Ehimwenma Adeyin was a non-tenured assistant principal at Rosa Parks Community School in Orange, New Jersey.  She began work in 2023, and her contract was renewed for the 2023-2024 school year.  She was permitted to participate in a two-year program to obtain a certificate from the New Jersey Department of Education for the position of principal.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/failure-to-give-timely-written-notice-of-non-renewal-requires-reinstatement-of-non-tenured-new-jersey-educator/"  title="Continue Reading Failure to Give Timely Written Notice of Non-Renewal Requires Reinstatement of Non-Tenured New Jersey Educator" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2326</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Supreme Court Explains Requirements of Enforceable Personal Guarantees</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-supreme-court-explains-requirements-of-enforceable-personal-guarantees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 19:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In New Jesey business law, a person or business may personally guaranty the performance of a third party.  If the third party defaults on its obligations, the party which gave the personal guaranty (the “guarantor”) then becomes liable for the third party’s default.  Different states have different requirements for the enforcement of personal guarantees, however.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New Jesey business law, a person or business may personally guaranty the performance of a third party.  If the third party defaults on its obligations, the party which gave the personal guaranty (the “guarantor”) then becomes liable for the third party’s default.  Different states have different requirements for the enforcement of personal guarantees, however.  On December 2, 2025, the<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-641 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/03/courthouse-1223280__340-300x200.jpg" alt="courthouse-1223280__340-300x200" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/03/courthouse-1223280__340-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/03/courthouse-1223280__340-180x120.jpg 180w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2017/03/courthouse-1223280__340.jpg 510w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /> New Jersey Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of <em>Extech Building Materials, Inc. vs. E&amp;N Construction, Inc</em>., explaining the requirements of  an enforceable personal guaranty under New Jersey contract law.  The main element is that the guarantor must clearly and unambiguously express its intent to personally guarantee the third-party’s obligation.</p>
<h3><strong>Background</strong></h3>
<p>E&amp;N Construction, Inc., a construction company, signed a two page agreement with Extech Building Materials, Inc. to purchase construction supplies.  They signed a two page, six paragraph agreement. The sixth paragraph provided:</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-supreme-court-explains-requirements-of-enforceable-personal-guarantees/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Supreme Court Explains Requirements of Enforceable Personal Guarantees" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2322</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Appeals Court Enforces Right of First Refusal in Commercial Contract</title>
		<link>https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-enforces-right-of-first-refusal-in-commercial-contract/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurice W. McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 22:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["New Jersey Business lawyers"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey right of first refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NJ contract attorneys]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/?p=2320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Jersey business law provides that parties to a contract may agree that after closing one party, usually the seller, can have the right to match another offer which a party receives.  This is called a “right of first refusal.”  This most frequently occurs in contracts for the sale of a business or the sale [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey business law provides that parties to a contract may agree that after closing one party, usually the seller, can have the right to match another offer which a party receives.  This is called a “right of first refusal.”  This most frequently occurs in contracts for the sale of a business or the sale of real estate, but also often occurs in leases and other contracts as well.  A New Jersey appeals court’s decision in the case of <em>PMG New Jersey II, LLC vs Amrit Inc.</em> examined the law regarding New Jersey law regarding contractual rights of first refusal.<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-2128 alignright" src="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg" alt="6-300x225" width="300" height="225" srcset="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-768x576.jpg 768w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-2048x1536.jpg 2048w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-1000x750.jpg 1000w, https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/2023/11/6-160x120.jpg 160w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h3><strong>Amrit, Inc. Buys a Gas Station and a Decade Later Litigation Ensues</strong></h3>
<p>The decision explained that in 2012, the parties entered into a into a Motor Fuel Supply Agreement (MFSA) in connection with Amrit, Inc.’s purchase of a gas station in New Brunswick, New Jersey from PMG New Jersey II, LLC.  The MFSA was amended three years later in 2015 to include a provision which provided that if the purchaser received an offer to buy the gas station, PMG had 30 days to give notice that it was exercising its right to purchase the gas station on the same terms and conditions as the new offer; if not it waived this right of first refusal.  The MFSA was later amended to last through 2027.</p>
<div class="read_more_link"><a href="https://www.newjerseylawyersblog.com/new-jersey-appeals-court-enforces-right-of-first-refusal-in-commercial-contract/"  title="Continue Reading New Jersey Appeals Court Enforces Right of First Refusal in Commercial Contract" class="more-link">Continue reading</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2320</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Requested URI is rejected) 

Served from: www.newjerseylawyersblog.com @ 2026-04-21 18:09:04 by W3 Total Cache
-->